From: jan.glauber@caviumnetworks.com (Jan Glauber)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: arm64: W+X mapping check failures
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:37:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180425133704.GA6474@hc> (raw)
Hi all,
enabling CONFIG_DEBUG_WX we see insecure mappings reported across various kernel
versions and machines. I've not yet seen this with upstream but that doesn't
mean much as the issue is a race and I cannot trigger it reliably.
The reported W+X mappings are gone after the boot is finished. The addresses
all belong to .init.* sections of the first loaded kernel modules.
Example log (I changed the warnings as I found the backtrace quite useless):
[ 39.157884] Freeing unused kernel memory: 5248K
[ 39.167997] note_prot_wx: Found insecure W+X mapping at start: ffff000000ab9000 addr: ffff000000abd000 pages: 4
[ 39.178246] note_prot_wx: Found insecure W+X mapping at start: ffff000000ac3000 addr: ffff000000ac5000 pages: 2
[ 39.188495] note_prot_wx: Found insecure W+X mapping at start: ffff000000acd000 addr: ffff000000ad0000 pages: 3
[ 39.198745] note_prot_wx: Found insecure W+X mapping at start: ffff000000af9000 addr: ffff000000afc000 pages: 3
[ 39.212981] Checked W+X mappings: FAILED, 12 W+X pages found, 0 non-UXN pages found
I think this is a race between module loading and the ptdump_check_wx().
The RCU'd do_free_init() can be delayed _after_ ptdump_check_wx() for a coming module.
I tried using stop_machine() around the memory check similar to arm but that does not
solve the race. It is not a critical issue as the .init sections are freed afterwards
anyway but still the warning is a bit misleading.
Any thoughts?
--Jan
next reply other threads:[~2018-04-25 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-25 13:37 Jan Glauber [this message]
2018-04-25 13:55 ` arm64: W+X mapping check failures Jeffrey Hugo
2018-04-25 14:50 ` Jan Glauber
2018-04-25 15:18 ` Jeffrey Hugo
2018-04-25 13:57 ` Mark Rutland
2018-04-25 14:47 ` Jan Glauber
2018-04-26 11:00 ` James Morse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180425133704.GA6474@hc \
--to=jan.glauber@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.