From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
Marko Kovacevic <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>,
Robert Sanford <rsanford@akamai.com>,
thomas@monjalon.net, erik.g.carrillo@intel.com,
olivier.matz@6wind.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lcore: make semantics of lcore role function more intuitive
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 08:38:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180426083842.5fc6c83c@xeon-e3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b25e9076c53da76cc658363bab8de60ebd69d10b.1524745985.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 14:42:31 +0100
Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com> wrote:
> rte_lcore_has_role() returns 0 if role of lcore matches requested
> role. The return value of the API is confusing, and this is a known
> problem with a deprecation notice announcing the change to more
> intuitive semantics:
>
> Commit 064518f68d48 ("doc: announce EAL API change to lcore role function")
> Cc: erik.g.carrillo@intel.com
>
> Implement changes announced in the deprecation notice, and remove it.
> Also, fix usages of this API to reflect the change. Control thread patches
> expected new behavior and were broken before, now they are fixed as well.
>
> Fixes: d651ee4919cd ("eal: set affinity for control threads")
> Cc: olivier.matz@6wind.com
>
> Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
It would make more sense if rte_lcore_has_role returned a bool
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-26 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-26 13:42 [PATCH] lcore: make semantics of lcore role function more intuitive Anatoly Burakov
2018-04-26 14:30 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-26 14:44 ` Carrillo, Erik G
2018-04-26 14:54 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-26 14:56 ` Carrillo, Erik G
2018-04-26 15:37 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-04-26 15:38 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180426083842.5fc6c83c@xeon-e3 \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=erik.g.carrillo@intel.com \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
--cc=marko.kovacevic@intel.com \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=rsanford@akamai.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.