Re: [v2, 3/6] eventdev: add crypto adapter implementation

[Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>]

-----Original Message-----
> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 18:13:24 +0530
> From: Abhinandan Gujjar <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>
> To: jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com,
>  akhil.goyal@nxp.com, dev@dpdk.org
> CC: narender.vangati@intel.com, abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com,
>  nikhil.rao@intel.com, gage.eads@intel.com
> Subject: [v2,3/6] eventdev: add crypto adapter implementation
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1
> 
> Signed-off-by: Abhinandan Gujjar <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nikhil Rao <nikhil.rao@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gage Eads <gage.eads@intel.com>
> ---
> +
> +/* Per crypto device information */
> +struct crypto_device_info {
> +	/* Pointer to cryptodev */
> +	struct rte_cryptodev *dev;
> +	/* Pointer to queue pair info */
> +	struct crypto_queue_pair_info *qpairs;
> +	/* Next queue pair to be processed */
> +	uint16_t next_queue_pair_id;
> +	/* Set to indicate cryptodev->eventdev packet
> +	 * transfer uses a hardware mechanism
> +	 */
> +	uint8_t internal_event_port;
> +	/* Set to indicate processing has been started */
> +	uint8_t dev_started;
> +	/* If num_qpairs > 0, the start callback will
> +	 * be invoked if not already invoked
> +	 */
> +	uint16_t num_qpairs;
> +};

Looks like it is used in fastpath, if so add the cache alignment.

> +
> +/* Per queue pair information */
> +struct crypto_queue_pair_info {
> +	/* Set to indicate queue pair is enabled */
> +	bool qp_enabled;
> +	/* Pointer to hold rte_crypto_ops for batching */
> +	struct rte_crypto_op **op_buffer;
> +	/* No of crypto ops accumulated */
> +	uint8_t len;
> +};
> +
> +static struct rte_event_crypto_adapter **event_crypto_adapter;
> +
> +eca_enq_to_cryptodev(struct rte_event_crypto_adapter *adapter,
> +		 struct rte_event *ev, unsigned int cnt)
> +{
> +	struct rte_event_crypto_adapter_stats *stats = &adapter->crypto_stats;
> +	union rte_event_crypto_metadata *m_data = NULL;
> +	struct crypto_queue_pair_info *qp_info = NULL;
> +	struct rte_crypto_op *crypto_op;
> +	unsigned int i, n = 0;
> +	uint16_t qp_id = 0, len = 0, ret = 0;

Please review the explicit '0' assignment.

> +	uint8_t cdev_id = 0;
> +
> +	stats->event_dequeue_count += cnt;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
> +		crypto_op = ev[i].event_ptr;
> +		if (crypto_op == NULL)
> +			continue;
> +		if (crypto_op->sess_type == RTE_CRYPTO_OP_WITH_SESSION) {
> +			m_data = rte_cryptodev_sym_session_get_private_data(
> +					crypto_op->sym->session);
> +			if (m_data == NULL) {
> +				rte_pktmbuf_free(crypto_op->sym->m_src);
> +				rte_crypto_op_free(crypto_op);
> +				continue;
> +			}
> +
> +			cdev_id = m_data->request_info.cdev_id;
> +			qp_id = m_data->request_info.queue_pair_id;
> +			qp_info = &adapter->cdevs[cdev_id].qpairs[qp_id];
> +			if (qp_info == NULL) {
> +				rte_pktmbuf_free(crypto_op->sym->m_src);
> +				rte_crypto_op_free(crypto_op);
> +				continue;
> +			}
> +			len = qp_info->len;
> +			qp_info->op_buffer[len] = crypto_op;
> +			len++;
> +
> +int __rte_experimental
> +rte_event_crypto_adapter_queue_pair_add(uint8_t id,
> +			uint8_t cdev_id,
> +			int32_t queue_pair_id,
> +			const struct rte_event_crypto_queue_pair_conf *conf)
> +{
> +	struct rte_event_crypto_adapter *adapter;
> +	struct rte_eventdev *dev;
> +	struct crypto_device_info *dev_info;
> +	uint32_t cap;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	RTE_EVENT_CRYPTO_ADAPTER_ID_VALID_OR_ERR_RET(id, -EINVAL);
> +
> +	if (!rte_cryptodev_pmd_is_valid_dev(cdev_id)) {
> +		RTE_EDEV_LOG_ERR("Invalid dev_id=%" PRIu8, cdev_id);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	adapter = eca_id_to_adapter(id);
> +	if (adapter == NULL)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	dev = &rte_eventdevs[adapter->eventdev_id];
> +	ret = rte_event_crypto_adapter_caps_get(adapter->eventdev_id,
> +						cdev_id,
> +						&cap);
> +	if (ret) {
> +	if ((cap & RTE_EVENT_CRYPTO_ADAPTER_CAP_INTERNAL_PORT_OP_NEW &&
> +	     adapter->mode == RTE_EVENT_CRYPTO_ADAPTER_ENQ_DEQ) || cap) {
> +		rte_spinlock_lock(&adapter->lock);
> +		ret = eca_init_service(adapter, id);
> +		if (ret == 0)
> +			ret = eca_add_queue_pair(adapter, cdev_id,
> +							queue_pair_id);
> +		rte_spinlock_unlock(&adapter->lock);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	rte_service_component_runstate_set(adapter->service_id, 1);

I guess, it will be called in HW case, if so, please move to appropriate
place.

> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int __rte_experimental
> +rte_event_crypto_adapter_queue_pair_del(uint8_t id, uint8_t cdev_id,
> +					int32_t queue_pair_id)
> +{
> +	struct rte_event_crypto_adapter *adapter;
> +	struct crypto_device_info *dev_info;
> +	struct rte_eventdev *dev;
> +	int ret = 0;

No need for explicit '0' assignment