From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <peterz@infradead.org>
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([2607:7c80:54:e::133])
	by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256)
	(Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <peterz@infradead.org>)
	id 1fDmkf-0005Ym-OH
	for speck@linutronix.de; Wed, 02 May 2018 10:04:38 +0200
Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100]
 helo=hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net)	by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa
 (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux))	id 1fDmkd-00031t-1g	for speck@linutronix.de;
 Wed, 02 May 2018 08:04:35 +0000
Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 10:04:32 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [MODERATED] Re: Updated L1TF native OS patch
Message-ID: <20180502080432.GA12180@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20180501234247.GA41910@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
 <alpine.LFD.2.21.999.1805011659300.17283@i7.lan>
 <20180502000512.GO75137@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
 <20180502012112.GQ75137@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180502012112.GQ75137@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: speck@linutronix.de
List-ID: <speck.linutronix.de>

On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 06:21:12PM -0700, speck for Andi Kleen wrote:
> Also attaching the unencrypted mbox for easier applying etc.

I would've expected patch 1 to be two separate patches; one flipping the
fields the other flipping the bits. That's just a wee bit easier to look
at.

And patch 4's X86_FEATURE_NO_L1TF_FIX is weird, we typically have
positive flags for the fixes, see PTI, RETPOLINE and
SPEC_STORE_BYPASS_DISABLE.