From: Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com>
To: monis@mellanox.com, dledford@redhat.com, jgg@ziepe.ca,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
yanjun.zhu@oracle.com
Subject: [PATCH v3] nvmet,rxe: defer ip datagram sending to tasklet
Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 22:58:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180507205858.GA11664@gmail.com> (raw)
This addresses 3 separate problems:
1. When using NVME over Fabrics we may end up sending IP
packets in interrupt context, we should defer this work
to a tasklet.
[ 50.939957] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 0 at kernel/softirq.c:161 __local_bh_enable_ip+0x1f/0xa0
[ 50.942602] CPU: 3 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/3 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 4.17.0-rc3-ARCH+ #104
[ 50.945466] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-20171110_100015-anatol 04/01/2014
[ 50.948163] RIP: 0010:__local_bh_enable_ip+0x1f/0xa0
[ 50.949631] RSP: 0018:ffff88009c183900 EFLAGS: 00010006
[ 50.951029] RAX: 0000000080010403 RBX: 0000000000000200 RCX: 0000000000000001
[ 50.952636] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000200 RDI: ffffffff817e04ec
[ 50.954278] RBP: ffff88009c183910 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000614
[ 50.956000] R10: ffffea00021d5500 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffffffff817e04ec
[ 50.957779] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff88009566f400 R15: ffff8800956c7000
[ 50.959402] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88009c180000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 50.961552] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 50.963798] CR2: 000055c4ec0ccac0 CR3: 0000000002209001 CR4: 00000000000606e0
[ 50.966121] Call Trace:
[ 50.966845] <IRQ>
[ 50.967497] __dev_queue_xmit+0x62d/0x690
[ 50.968722] dev_queue_xmit+0x10/0x20
[ 50.969894] neigh_resolve_output+0x173/0x190
[ 50.971244] ip_finish_output2+0x2b8/0x370
[ 50.972527] ip_finish_output+0x1d2/0x220
[ 50.973785] ? ip_finish_output+0x1d2/0x220
[ 50.975010] ip_output+0xd4/0x100
[ 50.975903] ip_local_out+0x3b/0x50
[ 50.976823] rxe_send+0x74/0x120
[ 50.977702] rxe_requester+0xe3b/0x10b0
[ 50.978881] ? ip_local_deliver_finish+0xd1/0xe0
[ 50.980260] rxe_do_task+0x85/0x100
[ 50.981386] rxe_run_task+0x2f/0x40
[ 50.982470] rxe_post_send+0x51a/0x550
[ 50.983591] nvmet_rdma_queue_response+0x10a/0x170
[ 50.985024] __nvmet_req_complete+0x95/0xa0
[ 50.986287] nvmet_req_complete+0x15/0x60
[ 50.987469] nvmet_bio_done+0x2d/0x40
[ 50.988564] bio_endio+0x12c/0x140
[ 50.989654] blk_update_request+0x185/0x2a0
[ 50.990947] blk_mq_end_request+0x1e/0x80
[ 50.991997] nvme_complete_rq+0x1cc/0x1e0
[ 50.993171] nvme_pci_complete_rq+0x117/0x120
[ 50.994355] __blk_mq_complete_request+0x15e/0x180
[ 50.995988] blk_mq_complete_request+0x6f/0xa0
[ 50.997304] nvme_process_cq+0xe0/0x1b0
[ 50.998494] nvme_irq+0x28/0x50
[ 50.999572] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0xa2/0x1c0
[ 51.000986] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x32/0x80
[ 51.002356] handle_irq_event+0x3c/0x60
[ 51.003463] handle_edge_irq+0x1c9/0x200
[ 51.004473] handle_irq+0x23/0x30
[ 51.005363] do_IRQ+0x46/0xd0
[ 51.006182] common_interrupt+0xf/0xf
[ 51.007129] </IRQ>
2. Work must always be offloaded to tasklet when using NVMEoF in order to
solve lock ordering between neigh->ha_lock seqlock and the nvme queue lock:
[ 77.833783] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
[ 77.833783]
[ 77.835831] CPU0 CPU1
[ 77.837129] ---- ----
[ 77.838313] lock(&(&n->ha_lock)->seqcount);
[ 77.839550] local_irq_disable();
[ 77.841377] lock(&(&nvmeq->q_lock)->rlock);
[ 77.843222] lock(&(&n->ha_lock)->seqcount);
[ 77.845178] <Interrupt>
[ 77.846298] lock(&(&nvmeq->q_lock)->rlock);
[ 77.847986]
[ 77.847986] *** DEADLOCK ***
3. Same goes for the lock ordering between sch->q.lock and nvme queue lock:
[ 47.634271] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
[ 47.634271]
[ 47.636452] CPU0 CPU1
[ 47.637861] ---- ----
[ 47.639285] lock(&(&sch->q.lock)->rlock);
[ 47.640654] local_irq_disable();
[ 47.642451] lock(&(&nvmeq->q_lock)->rlock);
[ 47.644521] lock(&(&sch->q.lock)->rlock);
[ 47.646480] <Interrupt>
[ 47.647263] lock(&(&nvmeq->q_lock)->rlock);
[ 47.648492]
[ 47.648492] *** DEADLOCK ***
Using NVMEoF after this patch seems to finally be stable, without it,
rxe eventually deadlocks the whole system and causes RCU stalls.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com>
---
v2->v3: Abandoned the idea of just offloading work to tasklet in irq
context. NVMEoF needs the work to always be offloaded in order to
function. I am unsure how large an impact this has on other rxe users.
drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_verbs.c | 12 ++----------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_verbs.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_verbs.c
index 2cb52fd48cf1..564453060c54 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_verbs.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_verbs.c
@@ -761,7 +761,6 @@ static int rxe_post_send_kernel(struct rxe_qp *qp, struct ib_send_wr *wr,
unsigned int mask;
unsigned int length = 0;
int i;
- int must_sched;
while (wr) {
mask = wr_opcode_mask(wr->opcode, qp);
@@ -791,14 +790,7 @@ static int rxe_post_send_kernel(struct rxe_qp *qp, struct ib_send_wr *wr,
wr = wr->next;
}
- /*
- * Must sched in case of GSI QP because ib_send_mad() hold irq lock,
- * and the requester call ip_local_out_sk() that takes spin_lock_bh.
- */
- must_sched = (qp_type(qp) == IB_QPT_GSI) ||
- (queue_count(qp->sq.queue) > 1);
-
- rxe_run_task(&qp->req.task, must_sched);
+ rxe_run_task(&qp->req.task, 1);
if (unlikely(qp->req.state == QP_STATE_ERROR))
rxe_run_task(&qp->comp.task, 1);
@@ -822,7 +814,7 @@ static int rxe_post_send(struct ib_qp *ibqp, struct ib_send_wr *wr,
if (qp->is_user) {
/* Utilize process context to do protocol processing */
- rxe_run_task(&qp->req.task, 0);
+ rxe_run_task(&qp->req.task, 1);
return 0;
} else
return rxe_post_send_kernel(qp, wr, bad_wr);
--
2.17.0
next reply other threads:[~2018-05-07 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-07 20:58 Alexandru Moise [this message]
2018-05-08 3:09 ` [PATCH v3] nvmet,rxe: defer ip datagram sending to tasklet Yanjun Zhu
2018-05-08 8:55 ` Alexandru Moise
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180507205858.GA11664@gmail.com \
--to=00moses.alexander00@gmail.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=monis@mellanox.com \
--cc=yanjun.zhu@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.