From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [RFC PATCH 1/7] pkg-meson: new infrastructure
Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 10:40:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180510104058.5bee486b@windsurf.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180509224128.GA11938@ned>
Hello Eric,
On Thu, 10 May 2018 00:41:28 +0200, Eric Le Bihan wrote:
> I added $$(HOST_CONFIGURE_OPTS), CFLAGS="$$(HOST_CFLAGS)" and
> LDFLAGS="$$(HOST_LDFLAGS)"
HOST_CONFIGURE_OPTS already contains CFLAGS=$(HOST_CFLAGS) and
LDFLAGS=$(HOST_LDFLAGS), so there is no need to use them in addition to
$(HOST_CONFIGURE_OPTS).
> before invoking Meson (as done in pkg-autotools.mk) and now it
> politely informs me that it will take these flags into account:
I don't understand why we are passing CFLAGS=$(HOST_CFLAGS) and
LDFLAGS=$(HOST_LDFLAGS) in pkg-autotools.mk, it seems totally useless
since they are already in $(HOST_CONFIGURE_OPTS).
They have been here in pkg-autotools.mk since we reworked the autotools
infrastructure on top of the generic package infrastructure, back in
2009. It's however later that CFLAGS and LDFLAGS have been added in
HOST_CONFIGURE_OPTS.
This should be fixed.
> The recommended workaround is to define install_rpath [4] in for the
> executable target, but this requires patching the sources of the
> Meson-based package when building its host variant, which does not sound
> very sensible.
>
> So it looks like the workaround used in NixOS [5], i.e. patching the
> host variant of Meson itself to remove the RPATH strip step, is
> preferable until upstream Meson settles on this topic. I'll send another
> patch for the meson package where this step is done in a post-extract
> hook of the host variant.
Why not a patch against Meson itself ?
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-10 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-07 10:57 [Buildroot] [RFC PATCH 0/7] Add pkg-meson infrastructure Eric Le Bihan
2018-05-07 10:57 ` [Buildroot] [RFC PATCH 1/7] pkg-meson: new infrastructure Eric Le Bihan
2018-05-07 15:02 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-05-07 19:38 ` Eric Le Bihan
2018-05-07 19:43 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-05-07 22:12 ` Eric Le Bihan
2018-05-08 21:00 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2018-05-09 22:41 ` Eric Le Bihan
2018-05-10 8:40 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2018-05-07 10:57 ` [Buildroot] [RFC PATCH 2/7] docs/manual: document pkg-meson infra Eric Le Bihan
2018-05-07 15:08 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-05-07 19:58 ` Eric Le Bihan
2018-05-07 10:57 ` [Buildroot] [RFC PATCH 3/7] libmpdclient: convert to " Eric Le Bihan
2018-05-07 10:57 ` [Buildroot] [RFC PATCH 4/7] systemd: " Eric Le Bihan
2018-05-07 10:57 ` [Buildroot] [RFC PATCH 5/7] ncmpc: " Eric Le Bihan
2018-05-07 10:57 ` [Buildroot] [RFC PATCH 6/7] mpd-mpc: " Eric Le Bihan
2018-05-07 10:57 ` [Buildroot] [RFC PATCH 7/7] enlightenment: " Eric Le Bihan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180510104058.5bee486b@windsurf.home \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.