From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, osandov@fb.com, efault@gmx.de,
paolo.valente@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] bfq-iosched: don't worry about reserved tags in limit_depth
Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 09:59:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180510165948.GB30485@vader> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1525969467-12476-3-git-send-email-axboe@kernel.dk>
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 10:24:20AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Reserved tags are used for error handling, we don't need to
> care about them for regular IO. The core won't call us for these
> anyway.
>
> Acked-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> ---
> block/bfq-iosched.c | 9 +--------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> index eefd8a4bc936..db38e88a5670 100644
> --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
> +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> @@ -542,14 +542,7 @@ static void bfq_limit_depth(unsigned int op, struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data)
> if (op_is_sync(op) && !op_is_write(op))
> return;
>
> - if (data->flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED) {
> - if (unlikely(!tags->nr_reserved_tags)) {
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> - return;
> - }
> - bt = &tags->breserved_tags;
> - } else
> - bt = &tags->bitmap_tags;
> + bt = &tags->bitmap_tags;
>
> if (unlikely(bfqd->sb_shift != bt->sb.shift))
> bfq_update_depths(bfqd, bt);
> --
> 2.7.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-10 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-10 16:24 [PATCHSET v3 0/9] blk-mq-sched and sbitmap shallow depth Jens Axboe
2018-05-10 16:24 ` [PATCH 1/9] blk-mq: don't call into depth limiting for reserved tags Jens Axboe
2018-05-10 16:59 ` Omar Sandoval
2018-05-10 16:24 ` [PATCH 2/9] bfq-iosched: don't worry about reserved tags in limit_depth Jens Axboe
2018-05-10 16:59 ` Omar Sandoval [this message]
2018-05-10 16:24 ` [PATCH 3/9] bfq: calculate shallow depths at init time Jens Axboe
2018-05-10 17:00 ` Omar Sandoval
2018-05-10 16:24 ` [PATCH 4/9] bfq-iosched: remove unused variable Jens Axboe
2018-05-10 17:00 ` Omar Sandoval
2018-05-10 16:24 ` [PATCH 5/9] sbitmap: fix missed wakeups caused by sbitmap_queue_get_shallow() Jens Axboe
2018-05-10 17:01 ` Omar Sandoval
2018-05-10 17:09 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-10 16:24 ` [PATCH 6/9] sbitmap: warn if using smaller shallow depth than was setup Jens Axboe
2018-05-10 17:02 ` Omar Sandoval
2018-05-10 17:09 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-10 16:24 ` [PATCH 7/9] bfq-iosched: update shallow depth to smallest one used Jens Axboe
2018-05-10 17:03 ` Omar Sandoval
2018-05-10 16:24 ` [PATCH 8/9] kyber-iosched: update shallow depth when setting up hardware queue Jens Axboe
2018-05-10 17:03 ` Omar Sandoval
2018-05-10 16:24 ` [PATCH 9/9] sbitmap: fix race in wait batch accounting Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180510165948.GB30485@vader \
--to=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.