From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
byungchul.park@lge.com, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/8] rcu: Add comment documenting how rcu_seq_snap works
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 10:38:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180514173816.GA26088@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180514031541.67247-2-joel@joelfernandes.org>
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 08:15:34PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> rcu_seq_snap may be tricky for someone looking at it for the first time.
> Lets document how it works with an example to make it easier.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> ---
> kernel/rcu/rcu.h | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
> index 003671825d62..fc3170914ac7 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
> @@ -91,7 +91,29 @@ static inline void rcu_seq_end(unsigned long *sp)
> WRITE_ONCE(*sp, rcu_seq_endval(sp));
> }
>
> -/* Take a snapshot of the update side's sequence number. */
> +/*
> + * Take a snapshot of the update side's sequence number.
> + *
> + * This function predicts what the grace period number will be the next
> + * time an RCU callback will be executed, given the current grace period's
> + * number. This can be gp+1 if RCU is idle, or gp+2 if a grace period is
> + * already in progress.
How about something like this?
This function returns the earliest value of the grace-period
sequence number that will indicate that a full grace period has
elapsed since the current time. Once the grace-period sequence
number has reached this value, it will be safe to invoke all
callbacks that have been registered prior to the current time.
This value is the current grace-period number plus two to the
power of the number of low-order bits reserved for state, then
rounded up to the next value in which the state bits are all zero.
> + *
> + * We do this with a single addition and masking.
Please either fold this sentence into rest of the paragraph or add a
blank line after it.
> + * For example, if RCU_SEQ_STATE_MASK=1 and the least significant bit (LSB) of
> + * the seq is used to track if a GP is in progress or not, its sufficient if we
> + * add (2+1) and mask with ~1. Let's see why with an example:
> + *
> + * Say the current seq is 6 which is 0b110 (gp is 3 and state bit is 0).
> + * To get the next GP number, we have to at least add 0b10 to this (0x1 << 1)
> + * to account for the state bit. However, if the current seq is 7 (gp is 3 and
> + * state bit is 1), then it means the current grace period is already in
> + * progress so the next time the callback will run is at the end of grace
> + * period number gp+2. To account for the extra +1, we just overflow the LSB by
> + * adding another 0x1 and masking with ~0x1. In case no GP was in progress (RCU
> + * is idle), then the addition of the extra 0x1 and masking will have no
> + * effect. This is calculated as below.
> + */
Having the explicit numbers is good, but please use RCU_SEQ_STATE_MASK=3,
since that is the current value. One alternative (or perhaps addition)
is to have a short table of numbers showing the mapping from *sp to the
return value. (I started from such a table when writing this function,
for whatever that is worth.)
Thanx, Paul
> static inline unsigned long rcu_seq_snap(unsigned long *sp)
> {
> unsigned long s;
> --
> 2.17.0.441.gb46fe60e1d-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-14 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-14 3:15 [PATCH RFC 0/8] rcu fixes, clean ups for rcu/dev Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 1/8] rcu: Add comment documenting how rcu_seq_snap works Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 3:47 ` Randy Dunlap
2018-05-14 5:05 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14 17:38 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2018-05-15 1:51 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15 3:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 7:02 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15 12:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 18:41 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15 19:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 22:55 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-16 15:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-16 23:21 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14 3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 2/8] rcu: Clarify usage of cond_resched for tasks-RCU Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 14:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-05-14 17:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 0:35 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15 3:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-14 3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 3/8] rcu: Add back the cpuend tracepoint Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 18:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 0:43 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14 3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 4/8] rcu: Get rid of old c variable from places in tree RCU Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 17:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 0:41 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14 3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 5/8] rcu: Use rcu_node as temporary variable in funnel locking loop Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 18:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 0:43 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14 3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 6/8] rcu: Add back the Startedleaf tracepoint Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 18:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 0:57 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15 3:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 23:04 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-16 15:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-16 23:13 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14 3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 7/8] rcu: trace CleanupMore condition only if needed Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 19:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 1:01 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15 3:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-14 3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 8/8] rcu: Fix cpustart tracepoint gp_seq number Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 20:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 1:02 ` Joel Fernandes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180514173816.GA26088@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.