All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	ncardwell@google.com, soheil@google.com, priyarjha@google.com,
	Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 7/8] tcp: new helper tcp_rack_skb_timeout
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 16:40:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180516234017.172775-8-ycheng@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180516234017.172775-1-ycheng@google.com>

Create and export a new helper tcp_rack_skb_timeout and move tcp_is_rack
to prepare the final RTO change.

Signed-off-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyaranjan Jha <priyarjha@google.com>
---
 include/net/tcp.h       |  2 ++
 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c    | 10 +++++-----
 net/ipv4/tcp_recovery.c |  9 +++++++--
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
index 402484ed9b57..b46d0f9adbdb 100644
--- a/include/net/tcp.h
+++ b/include/net/tcp.h
@@ -1880,6 +1880,8 @@ void tcp_init(void);
 /* tcp_recovery.c */
 void tcp_mark_skb_lost(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
 void tcp_newreno_mark_lost(struct sock *sk, bool snd_una_advanced);
+extern s32 tcp_rack_skb_timeout(struct tcp_sock *tp, struct sk_buff *skb,
+				u32 reo_wnd);
 extern void tcp_rack_mark_lost(struct sock *sk);
 extern void tcp_rack_advance(struct tcp_sock *tp, u8 sacked, u32 end_seq,
 			     u64 xmit_time);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index 1ccc97b368c7..ba8a8e3464aa 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -1917,6 +1917,11 @@ static inline void tcp_init_undo(struct tcp_sock *tp)
 	tp->undo_retrans = tp->retrans_out ? : -1;
 }
 
+static bool tcp_is_rack(const struct sock *sk)
+{
+	return sock_net(sk)->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_recovery & TCP_RACK_LOSS_DETECTION;
+}
+
 /* If we detect SACK reneging, forget all SACK information
  * and reset tags completely, otherwise preserve SACKs. If receiver
  * dropped its ofo queue, we will know this due to reneging detection.
@@ -2031,11 +2036,6 @@ static inline int tcp_dupack_heuristics(const struct tcp_sock *tp)
 	return tp->sacked_out + 1;
 }
 
-static bool tcp_is_rack(const struct sock *sk)
-{
-	return sock_net(sk)->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_recovery & TCP_RACK_LOSS_DETECTION;
-}
-
 /* Linux NewReno/SACK/ECN state machine.
  * --------------------------------------
  *
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_recovery.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_recovery.c
index b2f9be388bf3..30cbfb69b1de 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_recovery.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_recovery.c
@@ -47,6 +47,12 @@ u32 tcp_rack_reo_wnd(const struct sock *sk)
 		   tp->srtt_us >> 3);
 }
 
+s32 tcp_rack_skb_timeout(struct tcp_sock *tp, struct sk_buff *skb, u32 reo_wnd)
+{
+	return tp->rack.rtt_us + reo_wnd -
+	       tcp_stamp_us_delta(tp->tcp_mstamp, skb->skb_mstamp);
+}
+
 /* RACK loss detection (IETF draft draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-01):
  *
  * Marks a packet lost, if some packet sent later has been (s)acked.
@@ -92,8 +98,7 @@ static void tcp_rack_detect_loss(struct sock *sk, u32 *reo_timeout)
 		/* A packet is lost if it has not been s/acked beyond
 		 * the recent RTT plus the reordering window.
 		 */
-		remaining = tp->rack.rtt_us + reo_wnd -
-			    tcp_stamp_us_delta(tp->tcp_mstamp, skb->skb_mstamp);
+		remaining = tcp_rack_skb_timeout(tp, skb, reo_wnd);
 		if (remaining <= 0) {
 			tcp_mark_skb_lost(sk, skb);
 			list_del_init(&skb->tcp_tsorted_anchor);
-- 
2.17.0.441.gb46fe60e1d-goog

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-16 23:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-16 23:40 [PATCH net-next 0/8] tcp: default RACK loss recovery Yuchung Cheng
2018-05-16 23:40 ` [PATCH net-next 1/8] tcp: support DUPACK threshold in RACK Yuchung Cheng
2018-05-16 23:40 ` [PATCH net-next 2/8] tcp: disable RFC6675 loss detection Yuchung Cheng
2018-05-16 23:40 ` [PATCH net-next 3/8] tcp: simpler NewReno implementation Yuchung Cheng
2018-05-16 23:40 ` [PATCH net-next 4/8] tcp: account lost retransmit after timeout Yuchung Cheng
2018-05-16 23:40 ` [PATCH net-next 5/8] tcp: new helper tcp_timeout_mark_lost Yuchung Cheng
2018-05-16 23:40 ` [PATCH net-next 6/8] tcp: separate loss marking and state update on RTO Yuchung Cheng
2018-05-16 23:40 ` Yuchung Cheng [this message]
2018-05-16 23:40 ` [PATCH net-next 8/8] tcp: don't mark recently sent packets lost " Yuchung Cheng
2018-05-17 19:45 ` [PATCH net-next 0/8] tcp: default RACK loss recovery David Miller
2018-05-21 18:39   ` hiren panchasara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180516234017.172775-8-ycheng@google.com \
    --to=ycheng@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=priyarjha@google.com \
    --cc=soheil@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.