[bug report] bus: ti-sysc: Add handling for clkctrl opt clocks

[Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>]

Hello Tony Lindgren,

The patch 09dfe5810762: "bus: ti-sysc: Add handling for clkctrl opt
clocks" from Apr 16, 2018, leads to the following static checker
warning:

	drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c:131 sysc_get_one_clock()
	error: buffer overflow 'clock_names' 2 <= 9

drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c
   120  static int sysc_get_one_clock(struct sysc *ddata, const char *name)
   121  {
   122          int error, i, index = -ENODEV;
   123  
   124          if (!strncmp(clock_names[SYSC_FCK], name, 3))
   125                  index = SYSC_FCK;
   126          else if (!strncmp(clock_names[SYSC_ICK], name, 3))
   127                  index = SYSC_ICK;
   128  
   129          if (index < 0) {
   130                  for (i = SYSC_OPTFCK0; i < SYSC_MAX_CLOCKS; i++) {
   131                          if (!clock_names[i]) {
                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This isn't right.  The clock_names[] array only has the two elements...
Probably it should be testing ddate->clocks[i]?

   132                                  index = i;
   133                                  break;
   134                          }
   135                  }
   136          }
   137  
   138          if (index < 0) {
   139                  dev_err(ddata->dev, "clock %s not added\n", name);
   140                  return index;
   141          }
   142  
   143          ddata->clocks[index] = devm_clk_get(ddata->dev, name);
   144          if (IS_ERR(ddata->clocks[index])) {
   145                  if (PTR_ERR(ddata->clocks[index]) = -ENOENT)
   146                          return 0;
   147  
   148                  dev_err(ddata->dev, "clock get error for %s: %li\n",
   149                          name, PTR_ERR(ddata->clocks[index]));
   150  

Should we set ddata->clocks[index] = NULL on this path?

   151                  return PTR_ERR(ddata->clocks[index]);
   152          }


regards,
dan carpenter