All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RCU branching for the v4.19 merge window
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 07:40:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180517144044.GA6089@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)

Hello, Steve!

Another year, another difficult-to-branch set of RCU commits.

In happy contrast to last year, I can make some branches (SRCU, some
of the torture commits, and a few miscellaneous commits), but I will
likely end up with several short branches and one huge one.  My thought
is to keep the long branch, but email the patches out in a few separate
serieses, with each depending on its predecessor.  For example, one series
from the big branch would be folding the ->gpnum and ->completed fields
into a single ->gp_seq, which helps the RCU-flavor consolidation task.
Another series suppresses some rare false-positive splats that have been
plaguing me for more than a year.  Yet another series within this huge
branch applies and optimizes funnel locking for grace-period startup.

The problem is that the conversion to ->gp_seq has a very large footprint,
which of course generates lots of conflicts.  I could of course collapse
these commits into a single commit, but if I did that I would also defer
to the merge window following v4.19 due to the resulting loss of bisection
within that change.

Any advice?

The commits are for-mingo..rcu/dev in my -rcu tree.

							Thanx, Paul

             reply	other threads:[~2018-05-17 14:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-17 14:40 Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2018-05-22 15:27 ` RCU branching for the v4.19 merge window Steven Rostedt
2018-05-22 16:05   ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180517144044.GA6089@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.