From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
darrick.wong@oracle.com, tytso@mit.edu,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, clm@fb.com, jbacik@fb.com,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, willy@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] locking: export osq_lock()/osq_unlock()
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 06:18:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180518101804.GB15403@kmo-pixel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180518095204.GF12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:52:04AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 03:49:06AM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
>
> No.. and most certainly not without a _very_ good reason.
Ok, can I ask why?
Here's what it's for:
commit 61782bf71eef83919af100a9747d8d86dfdf3605
Author: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Date: Fri May 18 06:14:56 2018 -0400
bcachefs: SIX locks (shared/intent/exclusive)
New lock for bcachefs, like read/write locks but with a third state,
intent.
Intent locks conflict with each other, but not with read locks; taking a
write lock requires first holding an intent lock.
diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/six.c b/fs/bcachefs/six.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..afa59a476a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/fs/bcachefs/six.c
@@ -0,0 +1,516 @@
+
+#include <linux/log2.h>
+#include <linux/preempt.h>
+#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/sched/rt.h>
+
+#include "six.h"
+
+#define six_acquire(l, t) lock_acquire(l, 0, t, 0, 0, NULL, _RET_IP_)
+#define six_release(l) lock_release(l, 0, _RET_IP_)
+
+struct six_lock_vals {
+ /* Value we add to the lock in order to take the lock: */
+ u64 lock_val;
+
+ /* If the lock has this value (used as a mask), taking the lock fails: */
+ u64 lock_fail;
+
+ /* Value we add to the lock in order to release the lock: */
+ u64 unlock_val;
+
+ /* Mask that indicates lock is held for this type: */
+ u64 held_mask;
+
+ /* Waitlist we wakeup when releasing the lock: */
+ enum six_lock_type unlock_wakeup;
+};
+
+#define __SIX_LOCK_HELD_read __SIX_VAL(read_lock, ~0)
+#define __SIX_LOCK_HELD_intent __SIX_VAL(intent_lock, ~0)
+#define __SIX_LOCK_HELD_write __SIX_VAL(seq, 1)
+
+#define LOCK_VALS { \
+ [SIX_LOCK_read] = { \
+ .lock_val = __SIX_VAL(read_lock, 1), \
+ .lock_fail = __SIX_LOCK_HELD_write, \
+ .unlock_val = -__SIX_VAL(read_lock, 1), \
+ .held_mask = __SIX_LOCK_HELD_read, \
+ .unlock_wakeup = SIX_LOCK_write, \
+ }, \
+ [SIX_LOCK_intent] = { \
+ .lock_val = __SIX_VAL(intent_lock, 1), \
+ .lock_fail = __SIX_LOCK_HELD_intent, \
+ .unlock_val = -__SIX_VAL(intent_lock, 1), \
+ .held_mask = __SIX_LOCK_HELD_intent, \
+ .unlock_wakeup = SIX_LOCK_intent, \
+ }, \
+ [SIX_LOCK_write] = { \
+ .lock_val = __SIX_VAL(seq, 1), \
+ .lock_fail = __SIX_LOCK_HELD_read, \
+ .unlock_val = __SIX_VAL(seq, 1), \
+ .held_mask = __SIX_LOCK_HELD_write, \
+ .unlock_wakeup = SIX_LOCK_read, \
+ }, \
+}
+
+static inline void six_set_owner(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type,
+ union six_lock_state old)
+{
+ if (type != SIX_LOCK_intent)
+ return;
+
+ if (!old.intent_lock) {
+ EBUG_ON(lock->owner);
+ lock->owner = current;
+ } else {
+ EBUG_ON(lock->owner != current);
+ }
+}
+
+static inline void six_clear_owner(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type)
+{
+ if (type != SIX_LOCK_intent)
+ return;
+
+ EBUG_ON(lock->owner != current);
+
+ if (lock->state.intent_lock == 1)
+ lock->owner = NULL;
+}
+
+static __always_inline bool do_six_trylock_type(struct six_lock *lock,
+ enum six_lock_type type)
+{
+ const struct six_lock_vals l[] = LOCK_VALS;
+ union six_lock_state old;
+ u64 v = READ_ONCE(lock->state.v);
+
+ EBUG_ON(type == SIX_LOCK_write && lock->owner != current);
+
+ do {
+ old.v = v;
+
+ EBUG_ON(type == SIX_LOCK_write &&
+ ((old.v & __SIX_LOCK_HELD_write) ||
+ !(old.v & __SIX_LOCK_HELD_intent)));
+
+ if (old.v & l[type].lock_fail)
+ return false;
+ } while ((v = atomic64_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->state.counter,
+ old.v,
+ old.v + l[type].lock_val)) != old.v);
+
+ six_set_owner(lock, type, old);
+ return true;
+}
+
+__always_inline __flatten
+static bool __six_trylock_type(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type)
+{
+ if (!do_six_trylock_type(lock, type))
+ return false;
+
+ six_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 1);
+ return true;
+}
+
+__always_inline __flatten
+static bool __six_relock_type(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type,
+ unsigned seq)
+{
+ const struct six_lock_vals l[] = LOCK_VALS;
+ union six_lock_state old;
+ u64 v = READ_ONCE(lock->state.v);
+
+ do {
+ old.v = v;
+
+ if (old.seq != seq || old.v & l[type].lock_fail)
+ return false;
+ } while ((v = atomic64_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->state.counter,
+ old.v,
+ old.v + l[type].lock_val)) != old.v);
+
+ six_set_owner(lock, type, old);
+ six_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 1);
+ return true;
+}
+
+struct six_lock_waiter {
+ struct list_head list;
+ struct task_struct *task;
+};
+
+/* This is probably up there with the more evil things I've done */
+#define waitlist_bitnr(id) ilog2((((union six_lock_state) { .waiters = 1 << (id) }).l))
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCK_SPIN_ON_OWNER
+
+static inline int six_can_spin_on_owner(struct six_lock *lock)
+{
+ struct task_struct *owner;
+ int retval = 1;
+
+ if (need_resched())
+ return 0;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ owner = READ_ONCE(lock->owner);
+ if (owner)
+ retval = owner->on_cpu;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ /*
+ * if lock->owner is not set, the mutex owner may have just acquired
+ * it and not set the owner yet or the mutex has been released.
+ */
+ return retval;
+}
+
+static inline bool six_spin_on_owner(struct six_lock *lock,
+ struct task_struct *owner)
+{
+ bool ret = true;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ while (lock->owner == owner) {
+ /*
+ * Ensure we emit the owner->on_cpu, dereference _after_
+ * checking lock->owner still matches owner. If that fails,
+ * owner might point to freed memory. If it still matches,
+ * the rcu_read_lock() ensures the memory stays valid.
+ */
+ barrier();
+
+ if (!owner->on_cpu || need_resched()) {
+ ret = false;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ cpu_relax();
+ }
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static inline bool six_optimistic_spin(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type)
+{
+ struct task_struct *task = current;
+
+ if (type == SIX_LOCK_write)
+ return false;
+
+ preempt_disable();
+ if (!six_can_spin_on_owner(lock))
+ goto fail;
+
+ if (!osq_lock(&lock->osq))
+ goto fail;
+
+ while (1) {
+ struct task_struct *owner;
+
+ /*
+ * If there's an owner, wait for it to either
+ * release the lock or go to sleep.
+ */
+ owner = READ_ONCE(lock->owner);
+ if (owner && !six_spin_on_owner(lock, owner))
+ break;
+
+ if (do_six_trylock_type(lock, type)) {
+ osq_unlock(&lock->osq);
+ preempt_enable();
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * When there's no owner, we might have preempted between the
+ * owner acquiring the lock and setting the owner field. If
+ * we're an RT task that will live-lock because we won't let
+ * the owner complete.
+ */
+ if (!owner && (need_resched() || rt_task(task)))
+ break;
+
+ /*
+ * The cpu_relax() call is a compiler barrier which forces
+ * everything in this loop to be re-loaded. We don't need
+ * memory barriers as we'll eventually observe the right
+ * values at the cost of a few extra spins.
+ */
+ cpu_relax();
+ }
+
+ osq_unlock(&lock->osq);
+fail:
+ preempt_enable();
+
+ /*
+ * If we fell out of the spin path because of need_resched(),
+ * reschedule now, before we try-lock again. This avoids getting
+ * scheduled out right after we obtained the lock.
+ */
+ if (need_resched())
+ schedule();
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+#else /* CONFIG_LOCK_SPIN_ON_OWNER */
+
+static inline bool six_optimistic_spin(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
+#endif
+
+noinline
+static void __six_lock_type_slowpath(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type)
+{
+ const struct six_lock_vals l[] = LOCK_VALS;
+ union six_lock_state old, new;
+ struct six_lock_waiter wait;
+ u64 v;
+
+ if (six_optimistic_spin(lock, type))
+ return;
+
+ lock_contended(&lock->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
+
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wait.list);
+ wait.task = current;
+
+ while (1) {
+ set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+ if (type == SIX_LOCK_write)
+ EBUG_ON(lock->owner != current);
+ else if (list_empty_careful(&wait.list)) {
+ raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ list_add_tail(&wait.list, &lock->wait_list[type]);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ }
+
+ v = READ_ONCE(lock->state.v);
+ do {
+ new.v = old.v = v;
+
+ if (!(old.v & l[type].lock_fail))
+ new.v += l[type].lock_val;
+ else if (!(new.waiters & (1 << type)))
+ new.waiters |= 1 << type;
+ else
+ break; /* waiting bit already set */
+ } while ((v = atomic64_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->state.counter,
+ old.v, new.v)) != old.v);
+
+ if (!(old.v & l[type].lock_fail))
+ break;
+
+ schedule();
+ }
+
+ six_set_owner(lock, type, old);
+
+ __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+
+ if (!list_empty_careful(&wait.list)) {
+ raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ list_del_init(&wait.list);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ }
+}
+
+__always_inline
+static void __six_lock_type(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type)
+{
+ six_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0);
+
+ if (!do_six_trylock_type(lock, type))
+ __six_lock_type_slowpath(lock, type);
+
+ lock_acquired(&lock->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
+}
+
+static inline void six_lock_wakeup(struct six_lock *lock,
+ union six_lock_state state,
+ unsigned waitlist_id)
+{
+ struct list_head *wait_list = &lock->wait_list[waitlist_id];
+ struct six_lock_waiter *w, *next;
+
+ if (waitlist_id == SIX_LOCK_write && state.read_lock)
+ return;
+
+ if (!(state.waiters & (1 << waitlist_id)))
+ return;
+
+ clear_bit(waitlist_bitnr(waitlist_id),
+ (unsigned long *) &lock->state.v);
+
+ if (waitlist_id == SIX_LOCK_write) {
+ struct task_struct *p = READ_ONCE(lock->owner);
+
+ if (p)
+ wake_up_process(p);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(w, next, wait_list, list) {
+ list_del_init(&w->list);
+
+ if (wake_up_process(w->task) &&
+ waitlist_id != SIX_LOCK_read) {
+ if (!list_empty(wait_list))
+ set_bit(waitlist_bitnr(waitlist_id),
+ (unsigned long *) &lock->state.v);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
+}
+
+__always_inline __flatten
+static void __six_unlock_type(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type)
+{
+ const struct six_lock_vals l[] = LOCK_VALS;
+ union six_lock_state state;
+
+ EBUG_ON(!(lock->state.v & l[type].held_mask));
+ EBUG_ON(type == SIX_LOCK_write &&
+ !(lock->state.v & __SIX_LOCK_HELD_intent));
+
+ six_clear_owner(lock, type);
+
+ state.v = atomic64_add_return_release(l[type].unlock_val,
+ &lock->state.counter);
+ six_release(&lock->dep_map);
+ six_lock_wakeup(lock, state, l[type].unlock_wakeup);
+}
+
+#ifdef SIX_LOCK_SEPARATE_LOCKFNS
+
+#define __SIX_LOCK(type) \
+bool six_trylock_##type(struct six_lock *lock) \
+{ \
+ return __six_trylock_type(lock, SIX_LOCK_##type); \
+} \
+ \
+bool six_relock_##type(struct six_lock *lock, u32 seq) \
+{ \
+ return __six_relock_type(lock, SIX_LOCK_##type, seq); \
+} \
+ \
+void six_lock_##type(struct six_lock *lock) \
+{ \
+ __six_lock_type(lock, SIX_LOCK_##type); \
+} \
+ \
+void six_unlock_##type(struct six_lock *lock) \
+{ \
+ __six_unlock_type(lock, SIX_LOCK_##type); \
+}
+
+__SIX_LOCK(read)
+__SIX_LOCK(intent)
+__SIX_LOCK(write)
+
+#undef __SIX_LOCK
+
+#else
+
+bool six_trylock_type(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type)
+{
+ return __six_trylock_type(lock, type);
+}
+
+bool six_relock_type(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type,
+ unsigned seq)
+{
+ return __six_relock_type(lock, type, seq);
+
+}
+
+void six_lock_type(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type)
+{
+ __six_lock_type(lock, type);
+}
+
+void six_unlock_type(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type)
+{
+ __six_unlock_type(lock, type);
+}
+
+#endif
+
+/* Convert from intent to read: */
+void six_lock_downgrade(struct six_lock *lock)
+{
+ six_lock_increment(lock, SIX_LOCK_read);
+ six_unlock_intent(lock);
+}
+
+bool six_lock_tryupgrade(struct six_lock *lock)
+{
+ const struct six_lock_vals l[] = LOCK_VALS;
+ union six_lock_state old, new;
+ u64 v = READ_ONCE(lock->state.v);
+
+ do {
+ new.v = old.v = v;
+
+ EBUG_ON(!(old.v & l[SIX_LOCK_read].held_mask));
+
+ new.v += l[SIX_LOCK_read].unlock_val;
+
+ if (new.v & l[SIX_LOCK_intent].lock_fail)
+ return false;
+
+ new.v += l[SIX_LOCK_intent].lock_val;
+ } while ((v = atomic64_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->state.counter,
+ old.v, new.v)) != old.v);
+
+ six_set_owner(lock, SIX_LOCK_intent, old);
+ six_lock_wakeup(lock, new, l[SIX_LOCK_read].unlock_wakeup);
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+bool six_trylock_convert(struct six_lock *lock,
+ enum six_lock_type from,
+ enum six_lock_type to)
+{
+ EBUG_ON(to == SIX_LOCK_write || from == SIX_LOCK_write);
+
+ if (to == from)
+ return true;
+
+ if (to == SIX_LOCK_read) {
+ six_lock_downgrade(lock);
+ return true;
+ } else {
+ return six_lock_tryupgrade(lock);
+ }
+}
+
+/*
+ * Increment read/intent lock count, assuming we already have it read or intent
+ * locked:
+ */
+void six_lock_increment(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type)
+{
+ const struct six_lock_vals l[] = LOCK_VALS;
+
+ EBUG_ON(type == SIX_LOCK_write);
+ six_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0);
+
+ /* XXX: assert already locked, and that we don't overflow: */
+
+ atomic64_add(l[type].lock_val, &lock->state.counter);
+}
diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/six.h b/fs/bcachefs/six.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..f518c64c40
--- /dev/null
+++ b/fs/bcachefs/six.h
@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
+#ifndef _BCACHEFS_SIX_H
+#define _BCACHEFS_SIX_H
+
+#include <linux/lockdep.h>
+#include <linux/osq_lock.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+
+#include "util.h"
+
+#define SIX_LOCK_SEPARATE_LOCKFNS
+
+/*
+ * LOCK STATES:
+ *
+ * read, intent, write (i.e. shared/intent/exclusive, hence the name)
+ *
+ * read and write work as with normal read/write locks - a lock can have
+ * multiple readers, but write excludes reads and other write locks.
+ *
+ * Intent does not block read, but it does block other intent locks. The idea is
+ * by taking an intent lock, you can then later upgrade to a write lock without
+ * dropping your read lock and without deadlocking - because no other thread has
+ * the intent lock and thus no other thread could be trying to take the write
+ * lock.
+ */
+
+union six_lock_state {
+ struct {
+ atomic64_t counter;
+ };
+
+ struct {
+ u64 v;
+ };
+
+ struct {
+ /* for waitlist_bitnr() */
+ unsigned long l;
+ };
+
+ struct {
+ unsigned read_lock:26;
+ unsigned intent_lock:3;
+ unsigned waiters:3;
+ /*
+ * seq works much like in seqlocks: it's incremented every time
+ * we lock and unlock for write.
+ *
+ * If it's odd write lock is held, even unlocked.
+ *
+ * Thus readers can unlock, and then lock again later iff it
+ * hasn't been modified in the meantime.
+ */
+ u32 seq;
+ };
+};
+
+#define SIX_LOCK_MAX_RECURSE ((1 << 3) - 1)
+
+enum six_lock_type {
+ SIX_LOCK_read,
+ SIX_LOCK_intent,
+ SIX_LOCK_write,
+};
+
+struct six_lock {
+ union six_lock_state state;
+ struct task_struct *owner;
+ struct optimistic_spin_queue osq;
+
+ raw_spinlock_t wait_lock;
+ struct list_head wait_list[2];
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+ struct lockdep_map dep_map;
+#endif
+};
+
+static __always_inline void __six_lock_init(struct six_lock *lock,
+ const char *name,
+ struct lock_class_key *key)
+{
+ atomic64_set(&lock->state.counter, 0);
+ raw_spin_lock_init(&lock->wait_lock);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lock->wait_list[SIX_LOCK_read]);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lock->wait_list[SIX_LOCK_intent]);
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+ debug_check_no_locks_freed((void *) lock, sizeof(*lock));
+ lockdep_init_map(&lock->dep_map, name, key, 0);
+#endif
+}
+
+#define six_lock_init(lock) \
+do { \
+ static struct lock_class_key __key; \
+ \
+ __six_lock_init((lock), #lock, &__key); \
+} while (0)
+
+#define __SIX_VAL(field, _v) (((union six_lock_state) { .field = _v }).v)
+
+#ifdef SIX_LOCK_SEPARATE_LOCKFNS
+
+#define __SIX_LOCK(type) \
+bool six_trylock_##type(struct six_lock *); \
+bool six_relock_##type(struct six_lock *, u32); \
+void six_lock_##type(struct six_lock *); \
+void six_unlock_##type(struct six_lock *);
+
+__SIX_LOCK(read)
+__SIX_LOCK(intent)
+__SIX_LOCK(write)
+#undef __SIX_LOCK
+
+#define SIX_LOCK_DISPATCH(type, fn, ...) \
+ switch (type) { \
+ case SIX_LOCK_read: \
+ return fn##_read(__VA_ARGS__); \
+ case SIX_LOCK_intent: \
+ return fn##_intent(__VA_ARGS__); \
+ case SIX_LOCK_write: \
+ return fn##_write(__VA_ARGS__); \
+ default: \
+ BUG(); \
+ }
+
+static inline bool six_trylock_type(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type)
+{
+ SIX_LOCK_DISPATCH(type, six_trylock, lock);
+}
+
+static inline bool six_relock_type(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type,
+ unsigned seq)
+{
+ SIX_LOCK_DISPATCH(type, six_relock, lock, seq);
+}
+
+static inline void six_lock_type(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type)
+{
+ SIX_LOCK_DISPATCH(type, six_lock, lock);
+}
+
+static inline void six_unlock_type(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type)
+{
+ SIX_LOCK_DISPATCH(type, six_unlock, lock);
+}
+
+#else
+
+bool six_trylock_type(struct six_lock *, enum six_lock_type);
+bool six_relock_type(struct six_lock *, enum six_lock_type, unsigned);
+void six_lock_type(struct six_lock *, enum six_lock_type);
+void six_unlock_type(struct six_lock *, enum six_lock_type);
+
+#define __SIX_LOCK(type) \
+static __always_inline bool six_trylock_##type(struct six_lock *lock) \
+{ \
+ return six_trylock_type(lock, SIX_LOCK_##type); \
+} \
+ \
+static __always_inline bool six_relock_##type(struct six_lock *lock, u32 seq)\
+{ \
+ return six_relock_type(lock, SIX_LOCK_##type, seq); \
+} \
+ \
+static __always_inline void six_lock_##type(struct six_lock *lock) \
+{ \
+ six_lock_type(lock, SIX_LOCK_##type); \
+} \
+ \
+static __always_inline void six_unlock_##type(struct six_lock *lock) \
+{ \
+ six_unlock_type(lock, SIX_LOCK_##type); \
+}
+
+__SIX_LOCK(read)
+__SIX_LOCK(intent)
+__SIX_LOCK(write)
+#undef __SIX_LOCK
+
+#endif
+
+void six_lock_downgrade(struct six_lock *);
+bool six_lock_tryupgrade(struct six_lock *);
+bool six_trylock_convert(struct six_lock *, enum six_lock_type,
+ enum six_lock_type);
+
+void six_lock_increment(struct six_lock *, enum six_lock_type);
+
+#endif /* _BCACHEFS_SIX_H */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-18 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-18 7:48 [PATCH 00/10] RFC: assorted bcachefs patches Kent Overstreet
2018-05-18 7:48 ` [PATCH 01/10] mempool: Add mempool_init()/mempool_exit() Kent Overstreet
2018-05-18 8:21 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-05-18 8:21 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-05-18 8:21 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-05-18 7:49 ` [PATCH 01/10] mm: pagecache add lock Kent Overstreet
2018-05-18 13:13 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-05-18 15:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-18 17:45 ` Kent Overstreet
2018-05-23 23:55 ` Notes on locking for pagacache consistency (was: [PATCH 01/10] mm: pagecache add lock) Kent Overstreet
2018-05-20 22:45 ` [PATCH 01/10] mm: pagecache add lock Kent Overstreet
2018-05-23 15:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-23 17:12 ` Kent Overstreet
2018-05-18 7:49 ` [PATCH 02/10] block: Convert bio_set to mempool_init() Kent Overstreet
2018-05-18 8:23 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-05-18 8:23 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-05-18 8:23 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-05-18 7:49 ` [PATCH 02/10] mm: export find_get_pages() Kent Overstreet
2018-05-18 16:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-18 7:49 ` [PATCH 03/10] block: Add bioset_init()/bioset_exit() Kent Overstreet
2018-05-18 8:58 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-05-18 8:58 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-05-18 8:58 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-05-18 7:49 ` [PATCH 03/10] locking: bring back lglocks Kent Overstreet
2018-05-18 9:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-18 10:13 ` Kent Overstreet
2018-05-18 11:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-18 11:39 ` Kent Overstreet
2018-05-18 7:49 ` [PATCH 04/10] block: Use bioset_init() for fs_bio_set Kent Overstreet
2018-05-18 7:49 ` [PATCH 04/10] locking: export osq_lock()/osq_unlock() Kent Overstreet
2018-05-18 9:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-18 10:18 ` Kent Overstreet [this message]
2018-05-18 11:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-18 11:32 ` Kent Overstreet
2018-05-18 11:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-18 12:40 ` Kent Overstreet
2018-05-18 7:49 ` [PATCH 05/10] block: Add bio_copy_data_iter(), zero_fill_bio_iter() Kent Overstreet
2018-05-18 7:49 ` [PATCH 05/10] don't use spin_lock_irqsave() unnecessarily Kent Overstreet
2018-05-18 16:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-18 7:49 ` [PATCH 06/10] block: Split out bio_list_copy_data() Kent Overstreet
2018-05-18 7:49 ` [PATCH 06/10] Generic radix trees Kent Overstreet
2018-05-18 16:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-18 17:38 ` Kent Overstreet
2018-05-18 7:49 ` [PATCH 07/10] bcache: optimize continue_at_nobarrier() Kent Overstreet
2018-05-18 7:49 ` [PATCH 07/10] block: Add missing flush_dcache_page() call Kent Overstreet
2018-05-18 7:49 ` [PATCH 08/10] bcache: move closures to lib/ Kent Overstreet
2018-05-18 16:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-18 7:49 ` [PATCH 08/10] block: Add warning for bi_next not NULL in bio_endio() Kent Overstreet
2018-05-18 9:00 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-05-18 9:00 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-05-18 9:00 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-05-18 7:49 ` [PATCH 09/10] block: Export bio check/set pages_dirty Kent Overstreet
2018-05-18 7:49 ` [PATCH 09/10] closures: closure_wait_event() Kent Overstreet
2018-05-18 7:49 ` [PATCH 10/10] block: Add sysfs entry for fua support Kent Overstreet
2018-05-18 7:49 ` [PATCH 10/10] Dynamic fault injection Kent Overstreet
2018-05-18 16:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-18 17:37 ` Kent Overstreet
2018-05-18 19:05 ` Andreas Dilger
2018-05-18 19:10 ` Kent Overstreet
2018-05-18 20:54 ` Andreas Dilger
2018-05-18 7:55 ` [PATCH 00/10] RFC: assorted bcachefs patches Kent Overstreet
2018-05-18 17:45 ` Josef Bacik
2018-05-18 17:49 ` Kent Overstreet
2018-05-18 18:03 ` Josef Bacik
2018-05-18 18:28 ` Kent Overstreet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180518101804.GB15403@kmo-pixel \
--to=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.