All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
To: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/10] tools: bpftool: resolve calls without using imm field
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 12:36:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180522123643.5ed1e391@cakuba> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <02b16a573269b492d4449c0e587ccc0020973e8c.1527008647.git.sandipan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Tue, 22 May 2018 22:46:09 +0530, Sandipan Das wrote:
> Currently, we resolve the callee's address for a JITed function
> call by using the imm field of the call instruction as an offset
> from __bpf_call_base. If bpf_jit_kallsyms is enabled, we further
> use this address to get the callee's kernel symbol's name.
> 
> For some architectures, such as powerpc64, the imm field is not
> large enough to hold this offset. So, instead of assigning this
> offset to the imm field, the verifier now assigns the subprog
> id. Also, a list of kernel symbol addresses for all the JITed
> functions is provided in the program info. We now use the imm
> field as an index for this list to lookup a callee's symbol's
> address and resolve its name.
> 
> Suggested-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-22 19:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-22 17:16 [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/10] bpf: enhancements for multi-function programs Sandipan Das
2018-05-22 17:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/10] bpf: support 64-bit offsets for bpf function calls Sandipan Das
2018-05-22 17:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/10] bpf: powerpc64: pad function address loads with NOPs Sandipan Das
2018-05-22 17:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/10] bpf: powerpc64: add JIT support for multi-function programs Sandipan Das
2018-05-22 17:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/10] bpf: get kernel symbol addresses via syscall Sandipan Das
2018-05-22 17:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/10] tools: bpf: sync bpf uapi header Sandipan Das
2018-05-22 17:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/10] tools: bpftool: resolve calls without using imm field Sandipan Das
2018-05-22 19:36   ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2018-05-22 17:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/10] bpf: fix multi-function JITed dump obtained via syscall Sandipan Das
2018-05-22 19:47   ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-05-22 17:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/10] bpf: get JITed image lengths of functions " Sandipan Das
2018-05-22 17:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/10] tools: bpf: sync bpf uapi header Sandipan Das
2018-05-22 17:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/10] tools: bpftool: add delimiters to multi-function JITed dumps Sandipan Das
2018-05-22 19:55   ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-05-23  9:08     ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-05-23 10:37       ` Sandipan Das
2018-05-23 13:50         ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-05-23 13:59           ` Sandipan Das
2018-05-23 21:32         ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180522123643.5ed1e391@cakuba \
    --to=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandipan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.