From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: virtio-dev-return-4119-cohuck=redhat.com@lists.oasis-open.org Sender: List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Received: from lists.oasis-open.org (oasis-open.org [66.179.20.138]) by lists.oasis-open.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F6158191BB for ; Tue, 22 May 2018 06:17:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 16:17:37 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20180522161509-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <1526954781-35359-1-git-send-email-sridhar.samudrala@intel.com> <1526954781-35359-3-git-send-email-sridhar.samudrala@intel.com> <20180522090637.GE2149@nanopsycho> <20180522090853.GF2149@nanopsycho> <20180522161007-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20180522131422.GG2149@nanopsycho> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180522131422.GG2149@nanopsycho> Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH net-next v11 2/5] netvsc: refactor notifier/event handling code to use the failover framework To: Jiri Pirko Cc: Sridhar Samudrala , stephen@networkplumber.org, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, alexander.h.duyck@intel.com, kubakici@wp.pl, jasowang@redhat.com, loseweigh@gmail.com, aaron.f.brown@intel.com, anjali.singhai@intel.com List-ID: On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 03:14:22PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote: > Tue, May 22, 2018 at 03:12:40PM CEST, mst@redhat.com wrote: > >On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:08:53AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote: > >> Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:06:37AM CEST, jiri@resnulli.us wrote: > >> >Tue, May 22, 2018 at 04:06:18AM CEST, sridhar.samudrala@intel.com wrote: > >> >>Use the registration/notification framework supported by the generic > >> >>failover infrastructure. > >> >> > >> >>Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala > >> > > >> >In previous patchset versions, the common code did > >> >netdev_rx_handler_register() and netdev_upper_dev_link() etc > >> >(netvsc_vf_join()). Now, this is still done in netvsc. Why? > >> > > >> >This should be part of the common "failover" code. > >> > > >> > >> Also note that in the current patchset you use IFF_FAILOVER flag for > >> master, yet for the slave you use IFF_SLAVE. That is wrong. > >> IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE should be used. > > > >Or drop IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE and set both IFF_FAILOVER and IFF_SLAVE? > > No. IFF_SLAVE is for bonding. What breaks if we reuse it for failover? -- MST --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org