From: keith.busch@linux.intel.com (Keith Busch)
Subject: [PATCHv3 5/9] nvme-pci: End IO requests in CONNECTING state
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 15:03:13 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180524210313.GL11037@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180524204722.GB29048@lst.de>
On Thu, May 24, 2018@10:47:22PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2018@02:34:56PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > IO is always quiesced in the CONNECTING state, so any any timeout for an
> > IO command had already been completed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch at intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/nvme/host/pci.c | 8 ++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> > index 6be88f662e7d..54e22b964385 100644
> > --- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> > @@ -1227,6 +1227,14 @@ static enum blk_eh_timer_return nvme_timeout(struct request *req, bool reserved)
> > */
> > switch (dev->ctrl.state) {
> > case NVME_CTRL_CONNECTING:
> > + /*
> > + * IO is never dispatched from the connecting state. If an IO
> > + * queue timed out here, the block layer missed the completion
> > + * the driver already requested, so return handled.
> > + */
> > + if (nvmeq->qid)
> > + return BLK_EH_HANDLED;
>
> How can we hit this case? This just looks a lot like papering
> over the real issue..
It'll most likley never really happen. The conditions are a pretty obscure
timeout handling cases mixed with other errors that could theoretically
hit it, requiring two or more namespaces.
The real fix, IMO, is wahat the blk-mq timeout enhancements are working
toward, so I've no problem dropping this patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-24 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-24 20:34 [PATCHv3 0/9] nvme timeout fixes, v3 Keith Busch
2018-05-24 20:34 ` [PATCHv3 1/9] nvme: Sync request queues on reset Keith Busch
2018-05-25 12:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-25 14:22 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-25 14:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-25 14:45 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-25 15:56 ` James Smart
2018-05-25 16:24 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-25 18:04 ` James Smart
2018-05-25 18:30 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-30 23:25 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-06-05 16:25 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-30 23:24 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-05-24 20:34 ` [PATCHv3 2/9] nvme-pci: Fix queue freeze criteria " Keith Busch
2018-05-25 12:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-30 23:36 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-05-24 20:34 ` [PATCHv3 3/9] nvme: Move all IO out of controller reset Keith Busch
2018-05-25 13:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-25 14:41 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-24 20:34 ` [PATCHv3 4/9] nvme-pci: Rate limit the nvme timeout warnings Keith Busch
2018-05-25 13:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-30 6:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-24 20:34 ` [PATCHv3 5/9] nvme-pci: End IO requests in CONNECTING state Keith Busch
2018-05-24 20:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-24 21:03 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2018-05-25 12:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-24 20:34 ` [PATCHv3 6/9] nvme-pci: Unquiesce dead controller queues Keith Busch
2018-05-25 13:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-24 20:34 ` [PATCHv3 7/9] nvme-pci: Attempt reset retry for IO failures Keith Busch
2018-05-25 13:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-25 14:25 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-30 23:40 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-06-04 22:46 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-24 20:34 ` [PATCHv3 8/9] nvme-pci: Queue creation error handling Keith Busch
2018-05-25 12:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-05 16:28 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-30 23:37 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-05-24 20:35 ` [PATCHv3 9/9] nvme-pci: Don't wait for HMB completion on shutdown Keith Busch
2018-05-24 20:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-24 21:15 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-25 3:10 ` jianchao.wang
2018-05-25 15:09 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-25 12:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-13 0:48 ` [PATCHv3 0/9] nvme timeout fixes, v3 Ming Lei
2018-07-13 20:54 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180524210313.GL11037@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.