All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <20180528180914.4d70af2a@bbrezillon>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index b11036a..0c346fd 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> wrote:
 > a pain these days).
 > 
 > The panels we are using only supports one resolution (each), but the issue
-> is there with both 1920x1080@16bpp and 1024x768@8bpp (~60Hz).
+> is there with both 1920x1080 at 16bpp and 1024x768 at 8bpp (~60Hz).
 
 Duh! This adds to the weirdness of this issue. I'd thought that by
 dividing the required bandwidth by 2 you would get a reliable setup.
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ dividing the required bandwidth by 2 you would get a reliable setup.
 > > block and compared it to the max (LP)DDR bandwidth?  
 > 
 > I did, but don't remember the exact details. There is some room even for
-> 1920x1080@16bpp, but not oceans of it. We were a bit uncertain if 16bpp
+> 1920x1080 at 16bpp, but not oceans of it. We were a bit uncertain if 16bpp
 > would be possible, and in fact that was the reason I worked on CLUT
 > support for atmel-hlcdc last year. But since the problem persists with
 > much less memory pressure as well, I don't think that's it either.
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 4d2b8fd..0fb5931 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -17,24 +17,10 @@
  "ref\0c3cc1894-2d7d-93b6-a9de-ed9ca4564ae9@axentia.se\0"
  "ref\020180528162718.6be7191f@bbrezillon\0"
  "ref\0db31aac0-6b59-8835-2181-635670e7f176@axentia.se\0"
- "From\0Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: raw: atmel: add module param to avoid using dma\0"
+ "From\0boris.brezillon@bootlin.com (Boris Brezillon)\0"
+ "Subject\0[PATCH] mtd: nand: raw: atmel: add module param to avoid using dma\0"
  "Date\0Mon, 28 May 2018 18:09:14 +0200\0"
- "To\0Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>\0"
- "Cc\0Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>"
-  Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
-  Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>
-  Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
-  Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
-  Josh Wu <rainyfeeling@outlook.com>
-  Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr>
-  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
-  linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
-  Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
-  Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
-  David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
- " Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@microchip.com>\0"
+ "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Mon, 28 May 2018 17:52:53 +0200\n"
@@ -200,7 +186,7 @@
  "> a pain these days).\n"
  "> \n"
  "> The panels we are using only supports one resolution (each), but the issue\n"
- "> is there with both 1920x1080@16bpp and 1024x768@8bpp (~60Hz).\n"
+ "> is there with both 1920x1080 at 16bpp and 1024x768 at 8bpp (~60Hz).\n"
  "\n"
  "Duh! This adds to the weirdness of this issue. I'd thought that by\n"
  "dividing the required bandwidth by 2 you would get a reliable setup.\n"
@@ -210,7 +196,7 @@
  "> > block and compared it to the max (LP)DDR bandwidth?  \n"
  "> \n"
  "> I did, but don't remember the exact details. There is some room even for\n"
- "> 1920x1080@16bpp, but not oceans of it. We were a bit uncertain if 16bpp\n"
+ "> 1920x1080 at 16bpp, but not oceans of it. We were a bit uncertain if 16bpp\n"
  "> would be possible, and in fact that was the reason I worked on CLUT\n"
  "> support for atmel-hlcdc last year. But since the problem persists with\n"
  "> much less memory pressure as well, I don't think that's it either.\n"
@@ -223,4 +209,4 @@
  "understand the root cause of this problem. Tudor, any idea why the\n"
  various stuff Peter tried did not work?
 
-0e666c77872fa8f0a0457550c7bfa00fb453a2edf8d7627355f4fd3cca69461e
+acadc5da8395c537b4d011a46a8d456b5bf4acf31c5f7849ffd4b59c3451857f

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.