diff for duplicates of <20180529081127.GB14785@intel.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 2f17b02..8697fdf 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 09:58:00AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > Where the performance change is due to layout change of > > 'struct mem_cgroup': -> > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180528085201.GA2918(a)intel.com +> > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180528085201.GA2918@intel.com > > I do not follow. How can _this_ patch lead to an improvement when it > actually _adds_ an accounting? The other report you are mentioning is a diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index eacc80f..342a2ef 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,9 +1,18 @@ + "ref\020180528114019.GF9904@yexl-desktop\0" + "ref\020180528120318.GB27180@dhcp22.suse.cz\0" + "ref\0dbd727326f53648ed114e03a85085b6b4655fda2.camel@intel.com\0" "ref\020180529075800.GL27180@dhcp22.suse.cz\0" "From\0Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [lkp-robot] [mm, memcontrol] 309fe96bfc: vm-scalability.throughput +23.0% improvement\0" + "Subject\0Re: [LKP] [lkp-robot] [mm, memcontrol] 309fe96bfc: vm-scalability.throughput +23.0% improvement\0" "Date\0Tue, 29 May 2018 16:11:27 +0800\0" - "To\0lkp@lists.01.org\0" - "\01:1\0" + "To\0Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>\0" + "Cc\0Ye" + Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com> + tj@kernel.org <tj@kernel.org> + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> + lkp@01.org <lkp@01.org> + " hannes@cmpxchg.org <hannes@cmpxchg.org>\0" + "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 09:58:00AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:\n" "> On Tue 29-05-18 03:15:51, Lu, Aaron wrote:\n" @@ -37,7 +46,7 @@ "> > \n" "> > Where the performance change is due to layout change of\n" "> > 'struct mem_cgroup':\n" - "> > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180528085201.GA2918(a)intel.com\n" + "> > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180528085201.GA2918@intel.com\n" "> \n" "> I do not follow. How can _this_ patch lead to an improvement when it\n" "> actually _adds_ an accounting? The other report you are mentioning is a\n" @@ -63,4 +72,4 @@ "> _regression_ and I can imagine that the layout changes can lead to that\n" > result. -dcf13217ad091a96b5a7d73fcc3c6f73a9bed61834fce93678c7c2adc41c142c +07095278dd9a729983f4793e5fe1ca55ba361bee8a705bf0cdfdc23196ad9a25
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.