From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: subhra.mazumdar@oracle.com, steven.sistare@oracle.com,
dhaval.giani@oracle.com, rohit.k.jain@oracle.com,
umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com, matt@codeblueprint.co.uk,
riel@surriel.com, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: [RFC 04/11] sched/topology: Introduce sched_domain_cores()
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 16:22:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180530143106.082002139@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20180530142236.667774973@infradead.org
[-- Attachment #1: peterz-sis-again-4.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4004 bytes --]
In order to more efficiently iterate cores/smt, we need a cpumask
containing only the first thread of each core (for the LLC domain).
And since we're iterating SMT specific things, move sched_init_smt()
over there. Also track how many threads per core we have.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
include/linux/sched/topology.h | 9 +++++++++
kernel/sched/core.c | 18 ------------------
kernel/sched/fair.c | 3 +++
kernel/sched/sched.h | 2 ++
kernel/sched/topology.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
5 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/sched/topology.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
@@ -72,6 +72,8 @@ struct sched_domain_shared {
atomic_t ref;
atomic_t nr_busy_cpus;
int has_idle_cores;
+
+ unsigned long core_mask[0];
};
struct sched_domain {
@@ -162,6 +164,13 @@ static inline struct cpumask *sched_doma
return to_cpumask(sd->span);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
+static inline struct cpumask *sched_domain_cores(struct sched_domain *sd)
+{
+ return to_cpumask(sd->shared->core_mask);
+}
+#endif
+
extern void partition_sched_domains(int ndoms_new, cpumask_var_t doms_new[],
struct sched_domain_attr *dattr_new);
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -5854,22 +5854,6 @@ int sched_cpu_dying(unsigned int cpu)
}
#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
-DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sched_smt_present);
-
-static void sched_init_smt(void)
-{
- /*
- * We've enumerated all CPUs and will assume that if any CPU
- * has SMT siblings, CPU0 will too.
- */
- if (cpumask_weight(cpu_smt_mask(0)) > 1)
- static_branch_enable(&sched_smt_present);
-}
-#else
-static inline void sched_init_smt(void) { }
-#endif
-
void __init sched_init_smp(void)
{
sched_init_numa();
@@ -5891,8 +5875,6 @@ void __init sched_init_smp(void)
init_sched_rt_class();
init_sched_dl_class();
- sched_init_smt();
-
sched_smp_initialized = true;
}
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6238,6 +6238,9 @@ static inline int find_idlest_cpu(struct
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
+DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sched_smt_present);
+
+__read_mostly int sched_smt_weight = 1;
static inline void set_idle_cores(int cpu, int val)
{
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -910,6 +910,8 @@ static inline void update_idle_core(stru
__update_idle_core(rq);
}
+extern __read_mostly int sched_smt_weight;
+
#else
static inline void update_idle_core(struct rq *rq) { }
#endif
--- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
@@ -1190,8 +1190,39 @@ sd_init(struct sched_domain_topology_lev
*/
if (sd->flags & SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES) {
sd->shared = *per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sds, sd_id);
- atomic_inc(&sd->shared->ref);
atomic_set(&sd->shared->nr_busy_cpus, sd_weight);
+ if (atomic_read(&sd->shared->ref)) {
+ atomic_inc(&sd->shared->ref);
+ } else {
+#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
+ int core, smt, smt_weight;
+
+ /*
+ * Set the first SMT sibling of each core present in
+ * the domain span.
+ */
+ for_each_cpu(core, sched_domain_span(sd)) {
+ for_each_cpu(smt, cpu_smt_mask(core)) {
+ if (cpumask_test_cpu(smt, sched_domain_span(sd))) {
+ __cpumask_set_cpu(smt, sched_domain_cores(sd));
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * And track the presence and number of threads per core.
+ */
+
+ smt_weight = cpumask_weight(cpu_smt_mask(core));
+ if (smt_weight > sched_smt_weight) {
+ sched_smt_weight = smt_weight;
+ static_branch_enable(&sched_smt_present);
+ }
+ }
+#endif
+
+ atomic_set(&sd->shared->ref, 1);
+ }
}
sd->private = sdd;
@@ -1537,7 +1568,7 @@ static int __sdt_alloc(const struct cpum
*per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sd, j) = sd;
- sds = kzalloc_node(sizeof(struct sched_domain_shared),
+ sds = kzalloc_node(sizeof(struct sched_domain_shared) + cpumask_size(),
GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(j));
if (!sds)
return -ENOMEM;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-30 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-30 14:22 [RFC 00/11] select_idle_sibling rework Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-30 14:22 ` [RFC 01/11] sched/fair: Fix select_idle_cpu()s cost accounting Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-22 8:30 ` [lkp-robot] [sched/fair] a4e1c9c190: unixbench.score 1.8% improvement kernel test robot
2018-05-30 14:22 ` [RFC 02/11] sched/fair: Age the average idle time Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-30 14:22 ` [RFC 03/11] sched/fair: Only use time once Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-30 14:22 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-05-30 14:22 ` [RFC 05/11] sched/fair: Re-arrange select_idle_cpu() Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-30 14:22 ` [RFC 06/11] sched/fair: Make select_idle_cpu() proportional to cores Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-30 14:22 ` [RFC 07/11] sched/fair: Fold the select_idle_sibling() scans Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-30 14:22 ` [RFC 08/11] sched/fair: Optimize SIS_FOLD Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-13 5:21 ` [lkp-robot] [sched/fair] 89754410a3: vm-scalability.throughput 49.2% improvement kernel test robot
2018-05-30 14:22 ` [RFC 09/11] sched/fair: Remove SIS_AVG_PROP Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-30 14:22 ` [RFC 10/11] sched/fair: Remove SIS_AGE/SIS_ONCE Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-30 14:22 ` [RFC 11/11] sched/fair: Remove SIS_FOLD Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-19 22:06 ` [RFC 00/11] select_idle_sibling rework Matt Fleming
2018-06-20 22:20 ` Steven Sistare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180530143106.082002139@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=dhaval.giani@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rohit.k.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=steven.sistare@oracle.com \
--cc=subhra.mazumdar@oracle.com \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.