diff for duplicates of <20180531024247.GA15700@ming.t460p> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 7015ffd..a5a5010 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -On Tue, May 29, 2018@09:22:40AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: -> On Mon, May 28, 2018@11:02:36PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote: +On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 09:22:40AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: +> On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 11:02:36PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > No, what both Red Hat and SUSE are saying is: cool let's have a go at > > "Plan A" but, in parallel, what harm is there in allowing "Plan B" (dm > > multipath) to be conditionally enabled to coexist with native NVMe diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index ce2096d..8bedaf6 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -6,13 +6,27 @@ "ref\0yq1muwj45sg.fsf@oracle.com\0" "ref\020180529030236.GA28895@redhat.com\0" "ref\020180529072240.np5c62akbr7jqelr@linux-x5ow.site\0" - "From\0ming.lei@redhat.com (Ming Lei)\0" - "Subject\0[PATCH 0/3] Provide more fine grained control over multipathing\0" + "From\0Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>\0" + "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 0/3] Provide more fine grained control over multipathing\0" "Date\0Thu, 31 May 2018 10:42:48 +0800\0" + "To\0Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>\0" + "Cc\0Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>" + Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com> + Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> + Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> + James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com> + Ewan Milne <emilne@redhat.com> + Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> + Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> + Linux NVMe Mailinglist <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org> + Martin George <marting@netapp.com> + John Meneghini <John.Meneghini@netapp.com> + Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> + " Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" - "On Tue, May 29, 2018@09:22:40AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:\n" - "> On Mon, May 28, 2018@11:02:36PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:\n" + "On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 09:22:40AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:\n" + "> On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 11:02:36PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:\n" "> > No, what both Red Hat and SUSE are saying is: cool let's have a go at\n" "> > \"Plan A\" but, in parallel, what harm is there in allowing \"Plan B\" (dm\n" "> > multipath) to be conditionally enabled to coexist with native NVMe\n" @@ -32,4 +46,4 @@ "Thanks,\n" Ming -6a09bb77daa2be15f31b41afe34981a82409cf0aa347e355f6c44995d5aa9b36 +c76237910a58b868e6dd259856719e028890838a914d3e16eff8eef6d469431b
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.