From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>, "Tobin C. Harding" <me@tobin.cc>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Subject: Re: ptrval hiding -- first kernel messages look rather "interesting"
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2018 12:57:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180601105726.GA10068@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VcaVieUTRurTA-XL1G1Nc3dqjM0kXANd2bugq51UPCNWQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1995 bytes --]
On Fri 2018-06-01 13:49:41, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > v4.17 on n900:
> >
> > [ 0.000000] Virtual kernel memory layout:
> > [ 0.000000] vector : 0xffff0000 - 0xffff1000 ( 4 kB)
> > [ 0.000000] fixmap : 0xffc00000 - 0xfff00000 (3072 kB)
> > [ 0.000000] vmalloc : 0xd0000000 - 0xff800000 ( 760 MB)
> > [ 0.000000] lowmem : 0xc0000000 - 0xcff00000 ( 255 MB)
> > [ 0.000000] pkmap : 0xbfe00000 - 0xc0000000 ( 2 MB)
> > [ 0.000000] modules : 0xbf000000 - 0xbfe00000 ( 14 MB)
> > [ 0.000000] .text : 0x(ptrval) - 0x(ptrval) (8160 kB)
> > [ 0.000000] .init : 0x(ptrval) - 0x(ptrval) (1024 kB)
> > [ 0.000000] .data : 0x(ptrval) - 0x(ptrval) ( 309 kB)
> > [ 0.000000] .bss : 0x(ptrval) - 0x(ptrval) ( 333 kB)
> > [ 0.000000] NR_IRQS: 16, nr_irqs: 16, preallocated irqs: 16
> >
> > I mean -- security is nice, but perhaps we should adjust the messages
> > so this does not look like we are making fun of the user?
>
> Colleague of mine (perhaps you even know him) wrote recently a small
> patch that improves kernel by 400% by removing ptr_to_id() completely.
>
> Okay, joking is joking, but it was a proposal to have some command
> line option to enforce no-hash pointers.
> I would rather enable it when one of the existing option is present
> (like 'debug'), though it might alter the output in user space or
> something else.
> So, I have no strong opinion here.
I guess my proposal would be replacing the four lines with single line:
.text (8160 kB) .init (1024 kB) .data ( 309 kB) .bss ( 333 kB)
I'm not sure if exact addresses are normally useful, and having big
table saying "redacted!" looks strange.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-01 10:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-01 10:31 ptrval hiding -- first kernel messages look rather "interesting" Pavel Machek
2018-06-01 10:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-06-01 10:57 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2018-06-04 22:39 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180601105726.GA10068@amd \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=joel@jms.id.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@tobin.cc \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.