From: hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)
Subject: [PATCH V2] nvmet: allow file backed ns to use cache
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 14:29:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180606122939.GA13398@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180531140700.13708-1-chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com>
> + if (ns->file && ns->buffered_io != buffered_io) {
> + nvmet_ns_disable(ns);
> + ns->buffered_io = buffered_io;
> + ret = nvmet_ns_enable(ns);
> + }
This section should be under subsys->lock to protect against
concurrent modification. For which we'd need to move the locking
out of nvmet_ns_disable/nvmet_ns_enable into the existing callers,
which should probably be a prep patch for this one.
> - int ret;
> + int flags = O_RDWR | O_LARGEFILE | ns->buffered_io ? 0 : O_DIRECT;
> struct kstat stat;
> + int ret;
Cosmetic, but I'd prefer:
int flags = O_RDWR | O_LARGEFILE;
if (!ns->buffered_io)
flags |= O_DIRECT;
>
> - ns->file = filp_open(ns->device_path,
> - O_RDWR | O_LARGEFILE | O_DIRECT, 0);
> + ns->file = filp_open(ns->device_path, flags, 0);
> @@ -97,6 +111,7 @@ static ssize_t nvmet_file_submit_bvec(struct nvmet_req *req, loff_t pos,
> iocb->ki_pos = pos;
> iocb->ki_filp = req->ns->file;
> iocb->ki_flags = IOCB_DIRECT | ki_flags;
> + iocb->ki_flags = ki_flags | req->ns->buffered_io ? 0 : IOCB_DIRECT;
I'd rather use iocb_flags() here, e.g.
iocb->ki_flags = ki_flags | iocb_flags(ns->file);
> static void nvmet_file_execute_flush(struct nvmet_req *req)
> {
> + if (req->ns->buffered_io)
> + flush_workqueue(req->ns->file_wq);
No needed. NVMe Flush doesn't affect in-flight commands. Quote from
the spec:
The flush applies to all commands completed prior to the submission of the
Flush command. The controller may also flush additional data and/or
metadata from any namespace.
Otherwise this looks fine.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-06 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-31 14:07 [PATCH V2] nvmet: allow file backed ns to use cache Chaitanya Kulkarni
2018-06-06 12:29 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
[not found] ` <BN6PR04MB12037F7CBB662391A352B0CD867B0@BN6PR04MB1203.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
2018-06-11 20:12 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2018-06-13 7:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180606122939.GA13398@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.