Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] configure: Enable out-of-tree acceptance tests

[Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>]

On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 04:36:16PM -0300, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 06/06/2018 04:24 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 11:45:03AM -0300, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > [... something about config files ...]
> >>> And after that, the following would run all "console" tests:
> >>>
> >>>   avocado run -t console
> >>>
> >>> How does this sound?
> >>
> >> For my use cases this doesn't worry me, I'll let Eduardo/Fam opine about
> >> use_test_dir_when_no_references_given.
> > 
> > Well, I can't give an opinion because I couldn't understand
> > what's the final goal here.
> 
> You cut too much, the relevant part is:
> 
>   On 05/30/2018 10:06 PM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
>   > But at the same, there are security implications: `list` won't
>   > load/execute any test code (different from, say, standard Python
>   > unittests), while "run" obviously will.  So "avocado run" may end up
>   > running what users don't want if a malicious user controls
>   > "$avocado_datadir_paths_test_dir".

The final goal still isn't clear to me.  Why would somebody want
to use $avocado_datadir_paths_test_dir instead of just specifying
"." in the command-line?


> 
> > 
> > What exactly is missing in the current solution?  Why
> > "avocado run -t console ." wouldn't work?
> 
> It doesn't work in out-of-tree builds, I have to use the full path:
> 
>   >>   build_dir$ avocado run
> /full/path/to/sources/qemu/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py

Isn't the symlink you suggested a better solution than requiring
the user to edit a config file?

-- 
Eduardo