Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] mtd: rawnand: add NVIDIA Tegra NAND Flash controller driver

[Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>]

On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 08:23:51 +0200
Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> wrote:

> On 09.06.2018 07:52, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Fri, 08 Jun 2018 23:51:01 +0200
> > Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> wrote:
> > 
> >   
> >> >
> >> > void tegra_nand_controller_reset(struct tegra_nand_controller *ctrl)
> >> > {
> >> > 	int err;
> >> >
> >> > 	disable_irq(ctrl->irq);
> >> >
> >> > 	err = reset_control_reset(ctrl->rst);
> >> > 	if (err) {
> >> > 		dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Failed to reset HW: %d\n", err);
> >> > 		msleep(HW_TIMEOUT);
> >> > 	}
> >> >
> >> > 	writel_relaxed(NAND_CMD_STATUS, ctrl->regs + HWSTATUS_CMD);
> >> > 	writel_relaxed(HWSTATUS_MASK, ctrl->regs + HWSTATUS_MASK);
> >> > 	writel_relaxed(INT_MASK, ctrl->regs + ISR);  
> >>
> >> If we do a controller reset, there is much more state than that which
> >> needs to be restored. A lot of it is not readily available currently
> >> (timing, ECC settings...)  
> > 
> > This is actually a good test to detect what is not properly initialized
> > by the driver. Timings should be configured correctly through  
> > ->setup_data_interface(). ECC engine should be disabled by default and  
> > only enabled when ->{read,write}_page() is called.
> >   
> 
> Is setup_data_interface guaranteed to be called after a failed
> ->exec_op()/{read,write}_page()?

No. Maybe I misunderstood when tegra_nand_controller_reset() was
supposed to be called. That's something I would call only once, early
in the probe function, so that the controller is placed in a well-known
state before we start using it. Definitely not something you should
call after each error.

> 
> >>
> >> That seems a lot of work for a code path I do not intend to ever use :-)
> >>  
> > 
> > Not so sure it's a lot of work. If ECC and timing settings are the
> > only thing you need to initialize then it should work just fine.
> > Try with a controller reset and you'll know if you miss something ;-).  
> 
> Currently the setting gets written directly to the registers. Only the
> enable flag is set in the HW ECC {read,write}_page() functions. So I
> will have to store the complete register in the chip structure and write
> them on every {read,write}_page()?

Well, your solution works as long as you only have one chip connected
to the controller. What we usually set the ECC config in
->select_chip() (or at least make sure the current setting matches the
one we expect) and then enable the engine in read/write_page() (as you
seem to already do).