From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1fSPUL-0007rh-Md for mharc-qemu-trivial@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 12:16:13 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58980) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fSPUJ-0007q9-0O for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 12:16:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fSPUI-00028l-0W for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 12:16:10 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43842) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fSPUC-000244-AA; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 12:16:04 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 019853082A44; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 16:16:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from w520.home (ovpn-116-135.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.135]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE648C7C4; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 16:15:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 10:15:51 -0600 From: Alex Williamson To: Peter Maydell Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, patches@linaro.org, Richard Henderson , John Snow , Philippe =?UTF-8?B?TWF0aGlldS1EYXVkw6k=?= , Thomas Huth , Cornelia Huck , Markus Armbruster , Stefan Hajnoczi , Kevin Wolf Message-ID: <20180611101551.2f656715@w520.home> In-Reply-To: <20180611141716.3813-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org> References: <20180611141716.3813-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.45]); Mon, 11 Jun 2018 16:16:03 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH v2] CODING_STYLE: Define our preferred form for multiline comments X-BeenThere: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 16:16:12 -0000 On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 15:17:16 +0100 Peter Maydell wrote: > The codebase has a bit of a mix of different multiline > comment styles. State a preference for the Linux kernel > style: > /* > * Star on the left for each line. > * Leading slash-star and trailing star-slash > * each go on a line of their own. > */ > > Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell > --- > This is not my personal favourite, but seemed to be the > closest we had to consensus in the mail thread for v1; > I can live with it in order to avoid getting patches which > use the styles I like even less :-) > --- > CODING_STYLE | 17 +++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/CODING_STYLE b/CODING_STYLE > index 12ba58ee293..2d84f5f26d1 100644 > --- a/CODING_STYLE > +++ b/CODING_STYLE > @@ -124,6 +124,23 @@ We use traditional C-style /* */ comments and avoid // comments. > Rationale: The // form is valid in C99, so this is purely a matter of > consistency of style. The checkpatch script will warn you about this. > > +Multiline comments blocks should have a row of stars on the left, > +and the initial /* and terminating */ both on their own lines: > + /* > + * like > + * this > + */ > +This is the same format required by the Linux kernel coding style. > + > +(Some of the existing comments in the codebase use the GNU Coding > +Standards form which does not have stars on the left, or other > +variations; avoid these when writing new comments, but don't worry > +about converting to the preferred form unless you're editing that > +comment anyway.) > + > +Rationale: Consistency, and ease of visually picking out a multiline > +comment from the surrounding code. > + > 8. trace-events style > > 8.1 0x prefix Much preferred, thanks (tabs next? ;) Reviewed-by: Alex Williamson From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58935) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fSPUG-0007oQ-HG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 12:16:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fSPUC-00024u-GM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 12:16:08 -0400 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 10:15:51 -0600 From: Alex Williamson Message-ID: <20180611101551.2f656715@w520.home> In-Reply-To: <20180611141716.3813-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org> References: <20180611141716.3813-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] CODING_STYLE: Define our preferred form for multiline comments List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, patches@linaro.org, Richard Henderson , John Snow , Philippe =?UTF-8?B?TWF0aGlldS1EYXVkw6k=?= , Thomas Huth , Cornelia Huck , Markus Armbruster , Stefan Hajnoczi , Kevin Wolf On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 15:17:16 +0100 Peter Maydell wrote: > The codebase has a bit of a mix of different multiline > comment styles. State a preference for the Linux kernel > style: > /* > * Star on the left for each line. > * Leading slash-star and trailing star-slash > * each go on a line of their own. > */ > > Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell > --- > This is not my personal favourite, but seemed to be the > closest we had to consensus in the mail thread for v1; > I can live with it in order to avoid getting patches which > use the styles I like even less :-) > --- > CODING_STYLE | 17 +++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/CODING_STYLE b/CODING_STYLE > index 12ba58ee293..2d84f5f26d1 100644 > --- a/CODING_STYLE > +++ b/CODING_STYLE > @@ -124,6 +124,23 @@ We use traditional C-style /* */ comments and avoid // comments. > Rationale: The // form is valid in C99, so this is purely a matter of > consistency of style. The checkpatch script will warn you about this. > > +Multiline comments blocks should have a row of stars on the left, > +and the initial /* and terminating */ both on their own lines: > + /* > + * like > + * this > + */ > +This is the same format required by the Linux kernel coding style. > + > +(Some of the existing comments in the codebase use the GNU Coding > +Standards form which does not have stars on the left, or other > +variations; avoid these when writing new comments, but don't worry > +about converting to the preferred form unless you're editing that > +comment anyway.) > + > +Rationale: Consistency, and ease of visually picking out a multiline > +comment from the surrounding code. > + > 8. trace-events style > > 8.1 0x prefix Much preferred, thanks (tabs next? ;) Reviewed-by: Alex Williamson