diff for duplicates of <20180612184901.GC24187@kroah.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 3e1baf5..e6add0d 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 01:55:17PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, 2018-05-28 at 12:00 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: -> > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. +> > 4.4-stable review patch.��If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > ------------------ > > @@ -15,13 +15,13 @@ On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 01:55:17PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > before set_pmd_at(). > > > > The bug can lead to data loss, but the race window is tiny and I haven't -> > seen any reports that suggested that it happens in reality. So I don't +> > seen any reports that suggested that it happens in reality.��So I don't > > think it worth sending it to stable. > [...] > > This patch (of 12): > > > > This is an implementation of pmdp_establish() that is only suitable for -> > an architecture that doesn't have hardware dirty/accessed bits. In this +> > an architecture that doesn't have hardware dirty/accessed bits.��In this > > case we can't race with CPU which sets these bits and non-atomic > > approach is fine. > [...] diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 89dbe53..76b9cf7 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ "b\0" "On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 01:55:17PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:\n" "> On Mon, 2018-05-28 at 12:00 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:\n" - "> > 4.4-stable review patch.\302\240\302\240If anyone has any objections, please let me know.\n" + "> > 4.4-stable review patch.\303\257\302\277\302\275\303\257\302\277\302\275If anyone has any objections, please let me know.\n" "> > \n" "> > ------------------\n" "> > \n" @@ -45,13 +45,13 @@ "> > before set_pmd_at().\n" "> > \n" "> > The bug can lead to data loss, but the race window is tiny and I haven't\n" - "> > seen any reports that suggested that it happens in reality.\302\240\302\240So I don't\n" + "> > seen any reports that suggested that it happens in reality.\303\257\302\277\302\275\303\257\302\277\302\275So I don't\n" "> > think it worth sending it to stable.\n" "> [...]\n" "> > This patch (of 12):\n" "> > \n" "> > This is an implementation of pmdp_establish() that is only suitable for\n" - "> > an architecture that doesn't have hardware dirty/accessed bits.\302\240\302\240In this\n" + "> > an architecture that doesn't have hardware dirty/accessed bits.\303\257\302\277\302\275\303\257\302\277\302\275In this\n" "> > case we can't race with CPU which sets these bits and non-atomic\n" "> > approach is fine.\n" "> [...]\n" @@ -70,4 +70,4 @@ "\n" greg k-h -e4abd66efdd77a925eb3f8756442b25dd669e8b6e6894e0ec71bba05f48877a9 +14fb062455645f936295951c8587843238cb8dbb128c4356a8727f1a94aaf5b8
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.