From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linutronix.de (146.0.238.70:993) by crypto-ml.lab.linutronix.de with IMAP4-SSL for ; 12 Jun 2018 20:58:56 -0000 Received: from aserp2120.oracle.com ([141.146.126.78]) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1fSqNR-0004Uj-SQ for speck@linutronix.de; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 22:58:55 +0200 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w5CKuEpW079693 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 20:58:47 GMT Received: from userv0022.oracle.com (userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74]) by aserp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2jgecxk245-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 20:58:47 +0000 Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by userv0022.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w5CKwkXG012794 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 20:58:46 GMT Received: from abhmp0017.oracle.com (abhmp0017.oracle.com [141.146.116.23]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w5CKwk6a011525 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 20:58:46 GMT Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 16:58:44 -0400 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: [MODERATED] Re: [PATCH 5/8] L1TFv7 0 Message-ID: <20180612205844.GL25607@char.us.oracle.com> References: <20180607232533.A6E2361102@crypto-ml.lab.linutronix.de> <20180607232832.GI7220@tassilo.jf.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180607232832.GI7220@tassilo.jf.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: speck@linutronix.de List-ID: On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 04:28:32PM -0700, speck for Andi Kleen wrote: > On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 04:22:25PM -0700, speck for ak_at_linux.intel.com wrote: > > From: Andi Kleen > > Subject: x86/speculation/l1tf: Add sysfs reporting for l1tf > > > > L1TF core kernel workarounds are cheap and normally always enabled, > > However we still want to report in sysfs if the system is vulnerable > > or mitigated. Add the necessary checks. > > mbox for easier applying attached. Oddly enough I had to modify it and do s/>From/From/ Not sure where the '>' came from. Thanks!