From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>, carlos <carlos@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Restartable Sequences system call merged into Linux
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 14:27:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180614122759.GB8798@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <417742741.11550.1528821084084.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2024 bytes --]
On Tue 2018-06-12 12:31:24, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> ----- On Jun 12, 2018, at 9:11 AM, Florian Weimer fweimer@redhat.com wrote:
>
> > On 06/11/2018 10:04 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> >> ----- On Jun 11, 2018, at 3:55 PM, Florian Weimer fweimer@redhat.com wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 06/11/2018 09:49 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> >>>> It should be noted that there can be only one rseq TLS area registered per
> >>>> thread,
> >>>> which can then be used by many libraries and by the executable, so this is a
> >>>> process-wide (per-thread) resource that we need to manage carefully.
> >>>
> >>> Is it possible to resize the area after thread creation, perhaps even
> >>> from other threads?
> >>
> >> I'm not sure why we would want to resize it. The per-thread area is fixed-size.
> >> Its layout is here: include/uapi/linux/rseq.h: struct rseq
> >
> > Looks I was mistaken and this is very similar to the robust mutex list.
> >
> > Should we treat it the same way? Always allocate it for each new thread
> > and register it with the kernel?
>
> That would be an efficient way to do it, indeed. There is very little
> performance overhead to have rseq registered for all threads, whether or
> not they intend to run rseq critical sections.
People with slow / low memory machines would prefer not to see
overhead they don't need...
> I have a few possible approaches in mind (feel free to suggest other
> options):
>
> A) glibc exposes a strong __rseq_abi TLS symbol:
>
> - should ideally *not* be global-dynamic for performance reasons,
> - registration to kernel can either be handled explicitly by requiring
> application or libraries to call an API, or implicitly at thread
> creation,
...so I'd prefer explicit API call.
> B) librseq.so exposes a strong __rseq_abi symbol:
Works for me.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-14 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-11 19:49 Restartable Sequences system call merged into Linux Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-06-11 19:55 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-11 20:04 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-06-12 13:11 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-12 16:31 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-06-13 8:21 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-14 12:27 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2018-06-14 13:01 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-06-14 13:25 ` Pavel Machek
2018-06-14 13:32 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-14 13:46 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-06-15 5:10 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-15 17:44 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-06-14 13:38 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-06-14 13:49 ` Pavel Machek
2018-06-14 14:00 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-14 14:36 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-06-14 14:41 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-14 15:09 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-06-15 5:09 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-15 17:50 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-06-15 5:07 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-13 11:48 ` Heiko Carstens
2018-06-13 16:14 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-06-13 19:53 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180614122759.GB8798@amd \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.