From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: w@1wt.eu (Willy Tarreau) Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 22:42:40 +0200 Subject: Query: Patches break with Microsoft exchange server. In-Reply-To: <1281348164.12908.47.camel@localhost> References: <4C5F9B25.8080401@st.com> <20100809064957.GB16661@pengutronix.de> <4C5FA698.90904@st.com> <20100809090137.GP13165@mea-ext.zmailer.org> <1281348164.12908.47.camel@localhost> Message-ID: <20180619204240.GA32604@1wt.eu> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 11:02:44AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > If my corporate overloads told me I had to use my Exchange "messaging" > account for external email communication, they would get a quite clear > 'no' in response. My response may also contain suggestions that they use > certain other objects for purposes for which they were not designed. I'd say that if, after having been calmly explained the nature of the trouble caused, they don't care, it's a clear demonstration of total lack of respect of your work by deliberately breaking the tools you need to do it. Generally it's the signal that it's time to find a more respectful employer. Willy From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B629CC5AE5E for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 20:43:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E3F2075E for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 20:43:40 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 77E3F2075E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=1wt.eu Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757227AbeFSUnj (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jun 2018 16:43:39 -0400 Received: from wtarreau.pck.nerim.net ([62.212.114.60]:64857 "EHLO 1wt.eu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754833AbeFSUne (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jun 2018 16:43:34 -0400 Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w5JKge5p032612; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 22:42:40 +0200 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 22:42:40 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: David Woodhouse Cc: Matti Aarnio , viresh kumar , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: Query: Patches break with Microsoft exchange server. Message-ID: <20180619204240.GA32604@1wt.eu> References: <4C5F9B25.8080401@st.com> <20100809064957.GB16661@pengutronix.de> <4C5FA698.90904@st.com> <20100809090137.GP13165@mea-ext.zmailer.org> <1281348164.12908.47.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1281348164.12908.47.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 11:02:44AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > If my corporate overloads told me I had to use my Exchange "messaging" > account for external email communication, they would get a quite clear > 'no' in response. My response may also contain suggestions that they use > certain other objects for purposes for which they were not designed. I'd say that if, after having been calmly explained the nature of the trouble caused, they don't care, it's a clear demonstration of total lack of respect of your work by deliberately breaking the tools you need to do it. Generally it's the signal that it's time to find a more respectful employer. Willy