From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-serial <linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>,
SergeySenozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Use printk_safe context for TTY and UART port locks
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 11:56:41 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180620025641.GF650@jagdpanzerIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180619223447.4369748b@vmware.local.home>
On (06/19/18 22:34), Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > There is no valid reason why an UART driver should do a printk() of
> > any sort inside the critical region where the console is locked.
> >
> > Just remove those printk's, don't add new crazy locking.
>
> Perhaps we should do an audit of the console drivers and remove all
> printk, pr_* , WARN*, BUG* from them.
I think I did a terrible job explaining my motivation.
Sorry for that!
What I tried to address with my patch set was not a direct uart->printk,
but mostly all those
uart-> tty / core kernel / who knows what else -> printk
cases. When are in that special context "called from uart driver" which
can backfire on us.
-ss
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-20 2:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-15 9:39 [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Use printk_safe context for TTY and UART port locks Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-06-15 9:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/6] printk: move printk_safe macros to printk header Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-06-18 6:27 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-06-15 9:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/6] tty: add tty_port locking helpers Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-06-15 9:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/6] tty/pty: switch to tty_port helpers Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-06-15 9:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/6] serial: add uart port locking helpers Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-06-15 9:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/6] serial: switch to uart_port " Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-06-15 9:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/6] tty: 8250: " Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-06-18 13:38 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Use printk_safe context for TTY and UART port locks Alan Cox
2018-06-19 0:53 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-06-19 8:30 ` Petr Mladek
2018-06-19 8:59 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-06-20 2:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-20 2:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-20 2:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-22 16:21 ` Alan Cox
2018-06-22 16:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-23 5:21 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-06-20 2:56 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2018-06-20 2:50 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-06-20 3:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-20 4:28 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-06-28 2:55 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-06-19 8:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180620025641.GF650@jagdpanzerIV \
--to=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.