From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: inject caller information into the body of message
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 20:07:59 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180620110759.GD444@jagdpanzerIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACT4Y+bcp4fSBBq3F86T-C4+n-YkeXUGMqpvkJ6vj6mK-TU2EA@mail.gmail.com>
On (06/20/18 11:31), Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > BTW, pr_cont() handling is not so simple when we are in printk_safe()
> > context. Unlike vprintk_emit() [normal printk], we don't use any
> > dedicated pr_cont() buffer in printk_safe. So, at a glance, I suspect
> > that injecting context info at every printk_safe_log_store() call for
> > `for (...) pr_cont()' loop is going to produce something like this:
> > I<10> 23 I<10> 43 I<10> 47 ....
> >
> > // Hmm, maybe the line will endup having two prefixes. Once
> > // from printk_safe_log_store, the other from normal printk
> > // log_store().
> >
> > While the same `for (...) pr_cont()' called from normal printk() context
> > will produce
> > I<10> 32 43 47 ....
> >
> > It could be that I'm wrong.
> > Tetsuo, have you tested pr_cont() from printk_safe() context?
>
>
> So this is another reason to get rid of pr_cont entirely, right?
Getting rid of pr_cont() from important output would be totally cool.
Quoting Linus:
Only acceptable use of continuations is basically boot-time testing,
when you do things like
printk("Testing feature XYZ..");
this_may_blow_up_because_of_hw_bugs();
printk(KERN_CONT " ... ok\n");
I can recall at least 4 attempts when people tried to introduce new pr_cont()
or some concept with similar functionality to pr_cont(), but SMP safe. We
brought the first one - per-CPU pr_cont() buffers - to KS several years ago
but Linus didn't like it. Then there was a buffered printk() mode patch from
Tetsuo, then a solution from Steven, then I had my second try with a
soft-of-pr_cont() replacement.
So, if we could get rid of pr_cont() from the most important parts
(instruction dumps, etc) then I would just vote to leave pr_cont()
alone and avoid any handling of it in printk context tracking. Simply
because we wouldn't care about pr_cont(). This also could simplify
Tetsuo's patch significantly.
-ss
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-20 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <201804232233.CIC65675.OJSOMFQOFFHVtL@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
[not found] ` <CACT4Y+boyw_Qy=y-iTnsKZrtTgF0Hk3nHN_xtqUdX4etgiYDQw@mail.gmail.com>
2018-04-24 1:33 ` printk feature for syzbot? Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-04-24 14:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-04-26 10:06 ` Petr Mladek
2018-05-10 4:22 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-05-10 11:30 ` Petr Mladek
2018-05-10 12:11 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-05-10 14:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-05-10 14:50 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-05-11 1:45 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
[not found] ` <201805110238.w4B2cIGH079602@www262.sakura.ne.jp>
2018-05-11 6:21 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-05-11 9:17 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-05-11 9:50 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-05-11 11:58 ` [PATCH] printk: inject caller information into the body of message Tetsuo Handa
2018-05-17 11:21 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-05-17 11:52 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-05-18 12:15 ` Petr Mladek
2018-05-18 12:25 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-05-18 12:54 ` Petr Mladek
2018-05-18 13:08 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-05-24 2:21 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-05-23 10:19 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-05-24 2:14 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-05-26 6:36 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-06-20 5:44 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-06-20 8:31 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-06-20 8:45 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-06-20 9:06 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-06-20 9:18 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-06-20 9:31 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-06-20 11:07 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2018-06-20 11:32 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-06-20 13:06 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-06-22 13:06 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-06-25 1:41 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-06-25 9:36 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-06-27 10:29 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-09-10 11:20 ` Alexander Potapenko
2018-09-12 6:53 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-12 16:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-09-13 7:12 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-13 12:26 ` Petr Mladek
2018-09-13 14:28 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-14 1:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-09-14 2:15 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-14 6:57 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-14 10:37 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-09-14 11:50 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-14 12:03 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-09-14 12:22 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-19 11:02 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-09-24 8:11 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-09-27 16:10 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-09-28 9:02 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-28 9:09 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-28 11:01 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-09-29 10:51 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-29 11:15 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-10-01 2:37 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-10-01 2:58 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-10-01 11:21 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-10-02 6:38 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-10-08 10:31 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-10-08 16:03 ` Petr Mladek
2018-10-08 20:48 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-10-09 14:52 ` Petr Mladek
2018-10-09 21:19 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-10-10 10:14 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-10-11 10:20 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-10-11 13:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-10-08 15:43 ` Petr Mladek
2018-09-28 8:56 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-28 11:21 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-09-29 11:13 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-29 11:39 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-10-01 5:52 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-10-01 8:37 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-10-01 18:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-09-14 1:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-09-14 1:55 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-06-21 8:29 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-06-20 9:30 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-06-20 11:19 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-06-20 11:25 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-06-20 11:37 ` Fengguang Wu
2018-06-20 12:31 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-06-20 12:41 ` Fengguang Wu
2018-06-20 12:45 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-06-20 12:48 ` Fengguang Wu
2018-05-11 13:37 ` printk feature for syzbot? Steven Rostedt
2018-05-15 5:20 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-05-15 14:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-05-11 11:02 ` [PATCH] printk: fix possible reuse of va_list variable Tetsuo Handa
2018-05-11 11:27 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-05-17 11:57 ` Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180620110759.GD444@jagdpanzerIV \
--to=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.