From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:56262 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932341AbeFUNzT (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2018 09:55:19 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 07:58:32 -0600 From: Keith Busch To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Linux PCI , Bjorn Helgaas , Sinan Kaya , Oza Pawandeep Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] PCI/DPC: Defer event handling to work queue Message-ID: <20180621135831.GA26623@localhost.localdomain> References: <20180620213833.25072-1-keith.busch@intel.com> <20180620213833.25072-2-keith.busch@intel.com> <20180621072727.GA18738@infradead.org> <20180621072819.GB18738@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20180621072819.GB18738@infradead.org> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:28:19AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:27:27AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 03:38:28PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote: > > > This moves all event handling to the existing work queue, which will > > > make passing event information simpler to the handler. > > > > I wonder if just using a threaded interrupt would be useful for > > the DPC handler? > > Ok, I should have read until the end of the thread first.. It's still good to know the series was on the right path. :)