From: hch@infradead.org (Christoph Hellwig)
Subject: [PATCH] nvme: use __GFP_NOWARN for iod allocation
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 08:24:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180621152407.GA29947@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d9fcda4e-9ed2-5001-ef38-61f7c0247cfa@kernel.dk>
I guess we can live with it for now with a big comment
> ctrl->cntlid = le16_to_cpup(&id->cntlid);
> if (id->mdts)
> max_hw_sectors = 1 << (id->mdts + page_shift - 9);
> - else
> + else if (ctrl->ops->flags & NVME_F_FABRICS)
> max_hw_sectors = UINT_MAX;
> + else
> + max_hw_sectors = NVME_MAX_KB_SZ << 1;
Can this I think is better done by setting ctrl->max_hw_sectors
in the PCIe driver (similar to what the other drivers already do)
and then rely on the min_not_zero below to factor in MDTS.
> +/*
> + * These can be higher, but we need to ensure that any command doesn't
> + * require an sg allocation that needs more than a page of data.
> + */
> +#define NVME_MAX_KB_SZ 4096
I think this should move the pci.c
> +#define NVME_MAX_SEGS 127
And this could use a good explanation. Especially as I think
that we shouldn't apply the limit for fabrics. So instead we
might just add a new ctrl->max_segments field, which PCI sets,
and which then is min() with the otherwise calculated value.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-21 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-20 19:10 [PATCH] nvme: use __GFP_NOWARN for iod allocation Jens Axboe
2018-06-20 19:16 ` Jens Axboe
2018-06-20 20:09 ` Jens Axboe
2018-06-20 20:43 ` Keith Busch
2018-06-20 20:54 ` Jens Axboe
2018-06-20 22:30 ` Keith Busch
2018-06-20 22:30 ` Jens Axboe
2018-06-21 7:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-21 14:47 ` Jens Axboe
2018-06-21 15:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-21 15:04 ` Jens Axboe
2018-06-21 15:06 ` Jens Axboe
2018-06-21 15:24 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-06-21 15:26 ` Jens Axboe
2018-06-21 15:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-21 15:34 ` Jens Axboe
2018-06-21 15:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-21 15:49 ` Jens Axboe
2018-06-21 16:27 ` Keith Busch
2018-06-21 17:20 ` Jens Axboe
2018-06-21 17:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-21 19:18 ` Jens Axboe
2018-06-20 20:51 ` Jens Axboe
2018-06-21 7:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-21 14:37 ` Jens Axboe
2018-06-21 14:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-21 15:01 ` Jens Axboe
2018-06-21 7:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-21 14:39 ` Jens Axboe
2018-06-21 14:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-21 15:02 ` Jens Axboe
2018-06-21 15:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-21 15:11 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180621152407.GA29947@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.