From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>,
Byungchul Park <max.byungchul.park@gmail.com>,
jiangshanlai@gmail.com, josh@joshtriplett.org,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lge.com,
luto@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] rcu: Remove ->dynticks_nmi_nesting from struct rcu_dynticks
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 13:47:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180625204708.GS3593@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180625162557.7140664c@gandalf.local.home>
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 04:25:57PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 09:39:51 -0700
> Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:
>
> > For whatever its worth, I made some notes of what I understood from reading
> > the code and old posts because I was sure I would otherwise forget
> > everything:
> > http://www.joelfernandes.org/linuxinternals/2018/06/15/rcu-dynticks.html
>
> Nice write up. I may point some people to this ;-)
>
> Anyway "complications due to nested NMIs (yes NMIs can nest!)"
>
> What arch allows for NMIs to nest. Because we don't let that happen on
> x86, and there's code that I know of that is called by NMIs that is not
> re-entrant, and can crash if we allow for NMIs to nest. For example
> "in_nmi()" will not show that we are in_nmi() if we allow for nesting
> of NMIs. It has a single bit that gets incremented when we enter NMI
> code, and cleared when we leave it.
Last I checked with Andy Lutomirski, there are a number of things that,
though not NMIs, act like NMIs and that can interrupt each others'
handlers. This is on x86.
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-25 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-20 8:47 [RFC 1/2] rcu: Do prepare and cleanup idle depending on in_nmi() Byungchul Park
2018-06-20 8:47 ` [RFC 2/2] rcu: Remove ->dynticks_nmi_nesting from struct rcu_dynticks Byungchul Park
2018-06-20 14:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-20 16:05 ` Byungchul Park
2018-06-20 16:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-20 17:15 ` Byungchul Park
2018-06-20 17:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-21 6:39 ` Byungchul Park
2018-06-21 6:48 ` Byungchul Park
2018-06-21 10:08 ` Byungchul Park
2018-06-21 15:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-21 15:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-22 3:00 ` Byungchul Park
2018-06-22 13:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-22 5:56 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-22 13:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-22 14:19 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-22 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-22 16:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-22 18:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-22 18:19 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-22 18:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-22 20:05 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-25 8:28 ` Byungchul Park
2018-06-25 16:39 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-25 17:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-25 19:15 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-25 20:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-25 20:47 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2018-06-25 20:47 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-25 22:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-25 23:30 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-25 22:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-25 23:32 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-25 21:25 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-22 20:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-22 20:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-22 21:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-22 21:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-22 22:03 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-23 17:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-28 20:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-28 21:13 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 21:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-23 15:48 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-23 17:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-24 3:02 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-20 13:33 ` [RFC 1/2] rcu: Do prepare and cleanup idle depending on in_nmi() Steven Rostedt
2018-06-20 14:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-20 15:25 ` Byungchul Park
2018-06-20 14:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-20 15:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-20 15:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-20 16:11 ` Byungchul Park
2018-06-20 16:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-20 16:37 ` Byungchul Park
2018-06-20 16:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-20 16:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180625204708.GS3593@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=max.byungchul.park@gmail.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.