From: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2018-06-23
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 21:04:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180625210405.3a8d6f8a@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180624060020.55B692079C@mail.bootlin.com>
Hello,
On Sun, 24 Jun 2018 08:00:20 +0200 (CEST), Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Build statistics for 2018-06-23
> ===============================
[...]
> Results for branch 'master'
> ===========================
>
[...]
> arm | wiringpi-2.46 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/a1ca953247475a5f31fe9283ade05c9cba26853b |
Related to the version bump to 2.46, now the static build is disabled by the tool author,
make static in the wiringPi directory gives the following output:
$ cd build/wiringpi-2.46/wiringPi && make static
wiringPi is no-longer shipped with the ability to statically link it.
Many reasons but the biggest issue is people who have statically linked
wiringPi into their product - for example a Pi UPS device or a Tetris-like
game and not subsequently shipped their modified sources. These people are
no better than common thieves with complete disregard to the conditions
of the LGPL that wiringPi ships with.
Additionally, many think it's a good idea to statically link wiringPi
into their favourite language - like Node, and Java and other itsy bitsy
little things. These people have a complete and utter disregard to what
happens underneath when e.g. the Linux kernel changes on the Pi then
wiringPi stops as it depends on some Pi kernel features, then the poor
user get in-touch with me and I've had over 10,000 emails so-far and
it's now beyond a joke.
DO NOT STATICALLY LINK WIRINGPI.
Gordon Henderson, March 2018.
What to do? Honour Gordons request and disable wiringPi in buildroot for static
builds or patch the wiringPi makefile to re-introduce the static linking?
Regards,
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-25 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-24 6:00 [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2018-06-23 Thomas Petazzoni
2018-06-25 19:04 ` Peter Seiderer [this message]
2018-06-25 19:27 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180625210405.3a8d6f8a@gmx.net \
--to=ps.report@gmx.net \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.