diff for duplicates of <20180627201037.GA9504@linux.intel.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 52aa090..b481da5 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 10:19:15AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
 > > operations in ext4 which remove blocks from an inode (hole punch, truncate
 > > down, etc.) and pages which are pinned due to DAX DMA operations.
 > > 
-> > Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
+> > Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
 > > ---
 > >  fs/ext4/ext4.h     |  1 +
 > >  fs/ext4/extents.c  | 12 ++++++++++++
@@ -93,9 +93,13 @@ Yep, that's much better.  Thank you for the review.
 
 > Besides that the patch looks to me. You can add:
 > 
-> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
+> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
 > 
 > And I'm really wondering which protection are we still missing that you are
 > still able to hit the warning with these patches applied.
 
 I'm also very curious and am going to dig into that this week.
+_______________________________________________
+Linux-nvdimm mailing list
+Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
+https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index f7eac3a..f7ab12c 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -1,15 +1,14 @@
  "ref\020180620221503.25237-1-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com\0"
  "ref\020180620221503.25237-3-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com\0"
  "ref\020180622081915.dvqd5sxx7vzoijw3@quack2.suse.cz\0"
- "ref\020180622081915.dvqd5sxx7vzoijw3-4I4JzKEfoa/jFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org\0"
- "From\0Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>\0"
+ "From\0Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>\0"
  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 2/2] ext4: handle layout changes to pinned DAX mappings\0"
  "Date\0Wed, 27 Jun 2018 14:10:37 -0600\0"
- "To\0Jan Kara <jack-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>\0"
- "Cc\0linux-nvdimm-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org"
-  Dave Chinner <david-FqsqvQoI3Ljby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org>
-  Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
- " linux-ext4-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org\0"
+ "To\0Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>\0"
+ "Cc\0linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org"
+  Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
+  Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
+ " linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 10:19:15AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:\n"
@@ -18,7 +17,7 @@
  "> > operations in ext4 which remove blocks from an inode (hole punch, truncate\n"
  "> > down, etc.) and pages which are pinned due to DAX DMA operations.\n"
  "> > \n"
- "> > Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>\n"
+ "> > Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>\n"
  "> > ---\n"
  "> >  fs/ext4/ext4.h     |  1 +\n"
  "> >  fs/ext4/extents.c  | 12 ++++++++++++\n"
@@ -107,11 +106,15 @@
  "\n"
  "> Besides that the patch looks to me. You can add:\n"
  "> \n"
- "> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>\n"
+ "> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>\n"
  "> \n"
  "> And I'm really wondering which protection are we still missing that you are\n"
  "> still able to hit the warning with these patches applied.\n"
  "\n"
- I'm also very curious and am going to dig into that this week.
+ "I'm also very curious and am going to dig into that this week.\n"
+ "_______________________________________________\n"
+ "Linux-nvdimm mailing list\n"
+ "Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org\n"
+ https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
 
-d4d3b6ef2d99094831838d0a1249895d283ae0d58d146ee878196b35c146c7ae
+b30aaebe4bbbed0fa0b695a856624005f230ca5d55cc40f70559cca485045dd0
