All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
	oleg@redhat.com, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 16/27] rcu: Add comment documenting how rcu_seq_snap works
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:42:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180628174240.GM3593@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180628051028.GB79165@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com>

On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 10:10:28PM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 11:27:26AM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> [..]
> > > > > 	s = __ALIGN_MASK(s, RCU_SEQ_STATE_MASK);
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > I agree with Peter's suggestions for both the verbiage reduction in the
> > > > comments in the header, as the new code he is proposing is more
> > > > self-documenting. I believe I proposed a big comment just because the code
> > > > wasn't self-documenting or obvious previously so needed an explanation.
> > > > 
> > > > How would you like to proceed? Let me know what you guys decide, I am really
> > > > Ok with anything. If you guys agree, should I write a follow-up patch with
> > > > Peter's suggestion that applies on top of this one?  Or do we want to drop
> > > > this one in favor of Peter's suggestion?
> > > 
> > > Shortening the comment would be good, so please do that.
> 
> Paul,
> 
> Do you want to fold the below patch into the original one? Or do you prefer I
> resent the original patch fixed up?
> 
> Following is the patch ontop of current 'dev' branch in your tree, with the
> excessive comments removed.
> 
> Thanks to Peter for suggesting!

I merged this into the current commit, with the result shown below.

Thank you both!

							Thanx, Paul

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

commit c9a6ed70aad9f4571afba3e12e869f5fccc26a40
Author: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Date:   Tue May 22 23:38:13 2018 -0700

    rcu: Add comment documenting how rcu_seq_snap works
    
    rcu_seq_snap may be tricky to decipher. Lets document how it works with
    an example to make it easier.
    
    Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
    Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
    [ paulmck: Shrink comment as suggested by Peter Zijlstra. ]

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
index aa215d6355f8..89f13fffac73 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
@@ -91,7 +91,17 @@ static inline void rcu_seq_end(unsigned long *sp)
 	WRITE_ONCE(*sp, rcu_seq_endval(sp));
 }
 
-/* Take a snapshot of the update side's sequence number. */
+/*
+ * rcu_seq_snap - Take a snapshot of the update side's sequence number.
+ *
+ * This function returns the earliest value of the grace-period sequence number
+ * that will indicate that a full grace period has elapsed since the current
+ * time.  Once the grace-period sequence number has reached this value, it will
+ * be safe to invoke all callbacks that have been registered prior to the
+ * current time. This value is the current grace-period number plus two to the
+ * power of the number of low-order bits reserved for state, then rounded up to
+ * the next value in which the state bits are all zero.
+ */
 static inline unsigned long rcu_seq_snap(unsigned long *sp)
 {
 	unsigned long s;


  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-28 17:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-26  0:34 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/27] Post-gp_seq miscellaneous fixes for v4.19 Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26  0:34 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/27] rcu: Make rcu_read_unlock_special() static Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26  0:34 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/27] rcu: Improve rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch() reporting Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26  0:34 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/27] rcu: rcupdate.h: Get rid of Sphinx warnings at rcu_pointer_handoff() Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26  0:34 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/27] rcu: Use pr_fmt to prefix "rcu: " to logging output Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26  0:34 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/27] rcu: Improve RCU-tasks naming and comments Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26  0:34 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/27] rcu: Mark task as .need_qs less aggressively Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 17:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-26 18:03     ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 21:38       ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26  0:34 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/27] rcu: Inline rcu_dynticks_momentary_idle() into its sole caller Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26  0:34 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/27] rcu: Clarify and correct the rcu_preempt_qs() header comment Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26  0:34 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/27] rcu: Remove unused rcu_kick_nohz_cpu() function Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26  0:34 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/27] rcu: Remove unused local variable "cpu" Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26  0:34 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/27] rcu: Remove "inline" from panic_on_rcu_stall() and rcu_blocking_is_gp() Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26  0:34 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/27] rcu: Remove "inline" from rcu_torture_print_module_parms() Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26  0:34 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/27] rcu: Remove "inline" from rcu_perf_print_module_parms() Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26  0:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/27] rcu: Remove __maybe_unused from rcu_cpu_has_callbacks() Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26  0:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/27] rcu: Use RCU CPU stall timeout for rcu_check_gp_start_stall() Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26  0:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 16/27] rcu: Add comment documenting how rcu_seq_snap works Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 17:14   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-26 18:08     ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 19:21       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-26 19:31         ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 20:15           ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-26 22:27             ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 17:30   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-26 18:10     ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 19:27       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-27  4:39     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-27 17:54       ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-27 18:27         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-27 19:11           ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-28  5:10           ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 17:42             ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2018-06-26  0:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 17/27] rcu: Speed up calling of RCU tasks callbacks Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26  0:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 18/27] rcu: Add comment to the last sleep in the rcu tasks loop Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26  0:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 19/27] rcu: Add diagnostics for rcutorture writer stall warning Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26  0:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 20/27] rcu: Check the range of jiffies_till_{first,next}_fqs when setting them Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26  0:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 21/27] doc: Update synchronize_rcu() definition in whatisRCU.txt Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26  0:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 22/27] rcu: Make rcu_seq_diff() more exact Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26  0:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 23/27] MAINTAINERS: Update RCU, SRCU, and TORTURE-TEST entries Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26  0:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 24/27] rcu: Print stall-warning NMI dyntick state in hexadecimal Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26  0:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 25/27] srcu: Add grace-period number to rcutorture statistics printout Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26  0:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 26/27] rculist: Improve documentation for list_for_each_entry_from_rcu() Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26  0:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 27/27] rcu: Assign higher prio to RCU threads if rcutorture is built-in Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180628174240.GM3593@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.