From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49916) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fYu6i-0004EQ-LK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 10:10:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fYu6h-0004U2-Eo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 10:10:40 -0400 From: Kevin Wolf Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 16:09:57 +0200 Message-Id: <20180629140959.6690-28-kwolf@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20180629140959.6690-1-kwolf@redhat.com> References: <20180629140959.6690-1-kwolf@redhat.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 27/29] replication: Switch to byte-based calls List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-block@nongnu.org Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org From: Eric Blake We are gradually moving away from sector-based interfaces, towards byte-based. Make the change for the last few sector-based calls into the block layer from the replication driver. Ideally, the replication driver should switch to doing everything byte-based, but that's a more invasive change that requires a bit more auditing. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake Reviewed-by: Jeff Cody Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf --- block/replication.c | 14 ++++++++------ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/replication.c b/block/replication.c index 826db7b304..6349d6958e 100644 --- a/block/replication.c +++ b/block/replication.c @@ -246,13 +246,14 @@ static coroutine_fn int replication_co_readv(BlockDriverState *bs, backup_cow_request_begin(&req, child->bs->job, sector_num * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE, remaining_bytes); - ret = bdrv_co_readv(bs->file, sector_num, remaining_sectors, - qiov); + ret = bdrv_co_preadv(bs->file, sector_num * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE, + remaining_bytes, qiov, 0); backup_cow_request_end(&req); goto out; } - ret = bdrv_co_readv(bs->file, sector_num, remaining_sectors, qiov); + ret = bdrv_co_preadv(bs->file, sector_num * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE, + remaining_sectors * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE, qiov, 0); out: return replication_return_value(s, ret); } @@ -279,8 +280,8 @@ static coroutine_fn int replication_co_writev(BlockDriverState *bs, } if (ret == 0) { - ret = bdrv_co_writev(top, sector_num, - remaining_sectors, qiov); + ret = bdrv_co_pwritev(top, sector_num * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE, + remaining_sectors * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE, qiov, 0); return replication_return_value(s, ret); } @@ -306,7 +307,8 @@ static coroutine_fn int replication_co_writev(BlockDriverState *bs, qemu_iovec_concat(&hd_qiov, qiov, bytes_done, count); target = ret ? top : base; - ret = bdrv_co_writev(target, sector_num, n, &hd_qiov); + ret = bdrv_co_pwritev(target, sector_num * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE, + n * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE, &hd_qiov, 0); if (ret < 0) { goto out1; } -- 2.13.6