From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH vhost] vhost_net: Fix too many vring kick on busypoll
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 19:38:21 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180629193448-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1530259790-2414-1-git-send-email-makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 05:09:50PM +0900, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
> Under heavy load vhost busypoll may run without suppressing
> notification. For example tx zerocopy callback can push tx work while
> handle_tx() is running, then busyloop exits due to vhost_has_work()
> condition and enables notification but immediately reenters handle_tx()
> because the pushed work was tx. In this case handle_tx() tries to
> disable notification again, but when using event_idx it by design
> cannot. Then busyloop will run without suppressing notification.
> Another example is the case where handle_tx() tries to enable
> notification but avail idx is advanced so disables it again. This case
> also lead to the same situation with event_idx.
>
> The problem is that once we enter this situation busyloop does not work
> under heavy load for considerable amount of time, because notification
> is likely to happen during busyloop and handle_tx() immediately enables
> notification after notification happens. Specifically busyloop detects
> notification by vhost_has_work() and then handle_tx() calls
> vhost_enable_notify().
I'd like to understand the problem a bit better.
Why does this happen?
Doesn't this only happen if ring is empty?
> Because the detected work was the tx work, it
> enters handle_tx(), and enters busyloop without suppression again.
> This is likely to be repeated, so with event_idx we are almost not able
> to suppress notification in this case.
>
> To fix this, poll the work instead of enabling notification when
> busypoll is interrupted by something. IMHO signal_pending() and
> vhost_has_work() are kind of interruptions rather than signals to
> completely cancel the busypoll, so let's run busypoll after the
> necessary work is done. In order to avoid too long busyloop due to
> interruption, save the endtime in vq field and use it when reentering
> the work function.
>
> I observed this problem makes tx performance poor but does not rx. I
> guess it is because rx notification from socket is not that heavy so
> did not impact the performance even when we failed to mask the
> notification. Anyway for consistency I fixed rx routine as well as tx.
>
> Performance numbers:
>
> - Bulk transfer from guest to external physical server.
> [Guest]->vhost_net->tap--(XDP_REDIRECT)-->i40e --(wire)--> [Server]
> - Set 10us busypoll.
> - Guest disables checksum and TSO because of host XDP.
> - Measured single flow Mbps by netperf, and kicks by perf kvm stat
> (EPT_MISCONFIG event).
>
> Before After
> Mbps kicks/s Mbps kicks/s
> UDP_STREAM 1472byte 247758 27
> Send 3645.37 6958.10
> Recv 3588.56 6958.10
> 1byte 9865 37
> Send 4.34 5.43
> Recv 4.17 5.26
> TCP_STREAM 8801.03 45794 9592.77 2884
>
> Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Is this with busy poll enabled?
Are there CPU utilization #s?
> ---
> drivers/vhost/net.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 1 +
> drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> index eeaf6739215f..0e85f628b965 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> @@ -391,13 +391,14 @@ static inline unsigned long busy_clock(void)
> return local_clock() >> 10;
> }
>
> -static bool vhost_can_busy_poll(struct vhost_dev *dev,
> - unsigned long endtime)
> +static bool vhost_can_busy_poll(unsigned long endtime)
> {
> - return likely(!need_resched()) &&
> - likely(!time_after(busy_clock(), endtime)) &&
> - likely(!signal_pending(current)) &&
> - !vhost_has_work(dev);
> + return likely(!need_resched() && !time_after(busy_clock(), endtime));
> +}
> +
> +static bool vhost_busy_poll_interrupted(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> +{
> + return unlikely(signal_pending(current)) || vhost_has_work(dev);
> }
>
> static void vhost_net_disable_vq(struct vhost_net *n,
> @@ -437,10 +438,21 @@ static int vhost_net_tx_get_vq_desc(struct vhost_net *net,
>
> if (r == vq->num && vq->busyloop_timeout) {
> preempt_disable();
> - endtime = busy_clock() + vq->busyloop_timeout;
> - while (vhost_can_busy_poll(vq->dev, endtime) &&
> - vhost_vq_avail_empty(vq->dev, vq))
> + if (vq->busyloop_endtime) {
> + endtime = vq->busyloop_endtime;
> + vq->busyloop_endtime = 0;
> + } else {
> + endtime = busy_clock() + vq->busyloop_timeout;
> + }
> + while (vhost_can_busy_poll(endtime)) {
> + if (vhost_busy_poll_interrupted(vq->dev)) {
> + vq->busyloop_endtime = endtime;
> + break;
> + }
> + if (!vhost_vq_avail_empty(vq->dev, vq))
> + break;
> cpu_relax();
> + }
> preempt_enable();
> r = vhost_get_vq_desc(vq, vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov),
> out_num, in_num, NULL, NULL);
> @@ -509,12 +521,16 @@ static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
> break;
> /* Nothing new? Wait for eventfd to tell us they refilled. */
> if (head == vq->num) {
> - if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev, vq))) {
> + if (unlikely(vq->busyloop_endtime)) {
> + /* Busy poll is interrupted. */
> + vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
> + } else if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev, vq))) {
> vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
> continue;
> }
> break;
> }
> + vq->busyloop_endtime = 0;
> if (in) {
> vq_err(vq, "Unexpected descriptor format for TX: "
> "out %d, int %d\n", out, in);
> @@ -642,39 +658,51 @@ static void vhost_rx_signal_used(struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq)
>
> static int vhost_net_rx_peek_head_len(struct vhost_net *net, struct sock *sk)
> {
> - struct vhost_net_virtqueue *rvq = &net->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_RX];
> - struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq = &net->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_TX];
> - struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &nvq->vq;
> + struct vhost_net_virtqueue *rnvq = &net->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_RX];
> + struct vhost_net_virtqueue *tnvq = &net->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_TX];
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *rvq = &rnvq->vq;
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *tvq = &tnvq->vq;
> unsigned long uninitialized_var(endtime);
> - int len = peek_head_len(rvq, sk);
> + int len = peek_head_len(rnvq, sk);
>
> - if (!len && vq->busyloop_timeout) {
> + if (!len && tvq->busyloop_timeout) {
> /* Flush batched heads first */
> - vhost_rx_signal_used(rvq);
> + vhost_rx_signal_used(rnvq);
> /* Both tx vq and rx socket were polled here */
> - mutex_lock_nested(&vq->mutex, 1);
> - vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
> + mutex_lock_nested(&tvq->mutex, 1);
> + vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, tvq);
>
> preempt_disable();
> - endtime = busy_clock() + vq->busyloop_timeout;
> + if (rvq->busyloop_endtime) {
> + endtime = rvq->busyloop_endtime;
> + rvq->busyloop_endtime = 0;
> + } else {
> + endtime = busy_clock() + tvq->busyloop_timeout;
> + }
>
> - while (vhost_can_busy_poll(&net->dev, endtime) &&
> - !sk_has_rx_data(sk) &&
> - vhost_vq_avail_empty(&net->dev, vq))
> + while (vhost_can_busy_poll(endtime)) {
> + if (vhost_busy_poll_interrupted(&net->dev)) {
> + rvq->busyloop_endtime = endtime;
> + break;
> + }
> + if (sk_has_rx_data(sk) ||
> + !vhost_vq_avail_empty(&net->dev, tvq))
> + break;
> cpu_relax();
> + }
>
> preempt_enable();
>
> - if (!vhost_vq_avail_empty(&net->dev, vq))
> - vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
> - else if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev, vq))) {
> - vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
> - vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
> + if (!vhost_vq_avail_empty(&net->dev, tvq)) {
> + vhost_poll_queue(&tvq->poll);
> + } else if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev, tvq))) {
> + vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, tvq);
> + vhost_poll_queue(&tvq->poll);
> }
>
> - mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
> + mutex_unlock(&tvq->mutex);
>
> - len = peek_head_len(rvq, sk);
> + len = peek_head_len(rnvq, sk);
> }
>
> return len;
> @@ -804,6 +832,7 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net)
> mergeable = vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF);
>
> while ((sock_len = vhost_net_rx_peek_head_len(net, sock->sk))) {
> + vq->busyloop_endtime = 0;
> sock_len += sock_hlen;
> vhost_len = sock_len + vhost_hlen;
> headcount = get_rx_bufs(vq, vq->heads + nvq->done_idx,
> @@ -889,7 +918,12 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net)
> goto out;
> }
> }
> - vhost_net_enable_vq(net, vq);
> + if (unlikely(vq->busyloop_endtime)) {
> + /* Busy poll is interrupted. */
> + vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
> + } else {
> + vhost_net_enable_vq(net, vq);
> + }
> out:
> vhost_rx_signal_used(nvq);
> mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> index 9beefa6ed1ce..fe83578fe336 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -323,6 +323,7 @@ static void vhost_vq_reset(struct vhost_dev *dev,
> vhost_reset_is_le(vq);
> vhost_disable_cross_endian(vq);
> vq->busyloop_timeout = 0;
> + vq->busyloop_endtime = 0;
> vq->umem = NULL;
> vq->iotlb = NULL;
> __vhost_vq_meta_reset(vq);
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> index 6c844b90a168..7e9cf80ccae9 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> @@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ struct vhost_virtqueue {
> bool user_be;
> #endif
> u32 busyloop_timeout;
> + unsigned long busyloop_endtime;
> };
>
> struct vhost_msg_node {
> --
> 2.14.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-29 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-29 8:09 [PATCH vhost] vhost_net: Fix too many vring kick on busypoll Toshiaki Makita
2018-06-29 9:30 ` Jason Wang
2018-07-02 2:45 ` Toshiaki Makita
2018-07-02 2:54 ` Jason Wang
2018-07-02 4:37 ` Toshiaki Makita
2018-07-02 6:17 ` Jason Wang
2018-07-02 6:17 ` Jason Wang
2018-07-02 7:11 ` Toshiaki Makita
2018-07-02 7:52 ` Jason Wang
2018-07-02 8:05 ` Toshiaki Makita
2018-07-02 8:54 ` Jason Wang
2018-07-02 7:52 ` Jason Wang
2018-06-29 9:30 ` Jason Wang
2018-06-29 16:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2018-07-02 2:41 ` Jason Wang
2018-07-02 2:52 ` Toshiaki Makita
2018-07-02 3:05 ` Jason Wang
2018-07-02 2:59 ` Toshiaki Makita
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180629193448-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.