From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:37442 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752218AbeGAIsZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jul 2018 04:48:25 -0400 Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2018 10:48:22 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Daniel Wagner Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Steven Rostedt , Julia Cartwright , tglx@linutronix.de, stable@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Wagner Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.{9,14,16,17}] serial: sh-sci: Use spin_{try}lock_irqsave instead of open coding version Message-ID: <20180701084822.GA13234@kroah.com> References: <20180622135642.20349-1-wagi@monom.org> <20180622135642.20349-2-wagi@monom.org> <20180622141526.tv7kjzpz2k2ggxar@linutronix.de> <648f8f93-815a-cb74-7b5e-6974465cfaec@monom.org> <20180622143651.y3ggbnr5rzdaydih@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 04:51:47PM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote: > > Does Ben need this patch in CIP? > > Renesas ported a lot of features back for the iwg20m board to the CIP tree. > They have an strong interest to run the -rt spin on the CIP kernel too. I > don't think Ben needs it but he also prefers the patch flow via the stable > tree. > > That said, I don't mind adding the patch only to my cip-rt tree if that's > the correct way for -rt specific fixes. For any -rt specific fixes that are needed for those trees, I'll be glad to take them in the stable tree if it makes their life easier. No need for everyone to have to take the same fixes in lots of different trees, might as well share the load. For a patch like this, I don't object to taking it in my trees for that reason. thanks, greg k-h