From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 06:41:35 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Ming Lei Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Ming Lei , James Bottomley , Linux SCSI List , "Martin K . Petersen" , linux-block , Douglas Gilbert , Bart Van Assche , Jens Axboe , Omar Sandoval Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: scsi_debug: introduce module parameter of 'use_blk_mq' Message-ID: <20180702134134.GA15401@infradead.org> References: <20180702050642.26265-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20180702125422.GA600@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: List-ID: On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 09:13:35PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 8:54 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 01:06:42PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > >> With the introduced module parameter of 'use_blk_mq', it is easy > >> to switch between 'blk_mq' and 'non_blk_mq' by reloading scsi_debug > >> module, so that we can test scsi_mq/blk_mq related regressions easily. > > > > No. We should not make a per driver choice. > > Could you share us why we can't? Because it really is not a driver propery what code we use, it is one of the core scsi code. And intended as a temporary one, although it already has lasted far too long.