All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: mgorman@techsingularity.net, tytso@mit.edu,
	adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, darrick.wong@oracle.com,
	dchinner@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs: xfs: use BUG_ON if writepage call comes from direct reclaim
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 14:37:38 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180703043738.GG2234@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1530591079-33813-2-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>

On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 12:11:19PM +0800, Yang Shi wrote:
> direct reclaim doesn't write out filesystem page, only kswapd could do
> this. So, if it is called from direct relaim, it is definitely a bug.
> 
> And, Mel Gorman mentioned "Ultimately, this will be a BUG_ON." in commit
> 94054fa3fca1fd78db02cb3d68d5627120f0a1d4 ("xfs: warn if direct reclaim
> tries to writeback pages"),
> 
> It has been many years since that commit, so it should be safe to
> elevate WARN_ON to BUG_ON now.

NACK.

The existing code warns and then handles the situation gracefully -
this is the appropriate way to handle incorrect calling contexts.
There is absolutely no good reason to panic production kernels
in situations like this.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-03  4:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-03  4:11 [PATCH 1/2] fs: ext4: use BUG_ON if writepage call comes from direct reclaim Yang Shi
2018-07-03  4:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] fs: xfs: " Yang Shi
2018-07-03  4:37   ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2018-07-03 17:19   ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-07-03 10:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] fs: ext4: " Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-07-03 17:05   ` Yang Shi
2018-07-03 23:10     ` Yang Shi
2018-07-03 23:10       ` Yang Shi
2018-07-03 23:43     ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-07-04 14:03     ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180703043738.GG2234@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.