All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: joe.korty@concurrent-rt.com
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	<rostedt@goodmis.org>, <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT v2] sched/migrate_disable: fallback to preempt_disable() instead barrier()
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 15:05:02 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180706190502.GA26154@zipoli.concurrent-rt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180706105857.5tgi5irdxdryet64@linutronix.de>

On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 12:58:57PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On SMP + !RT migrate_disable() is still around. It is not part of spin_lock()
> anymore so it has almost no users. However the futex code has a workaround for
> the !in_atomic() part of migrate disable which fails because the matching
> migrade_disable() is no longer part of spin_lock().
> 
> On !SMP + !RT migrate_disable() is reduced to barrier(). This is not optimal
> because we few spots where a "preempt_disable()" statement was replaced with
> "migrate_disable()".
> 
> We also used the migration_disable counter to figure out if a sleeping lock is
> acquired so RCU does not complain about schedule() during rcu_read_lock() while
> a sleeping lock is held. This changed, we no longer use it, we have now a
> sleeping_lock counter for the RCU purpose.
> 
> This means we can now:
> - for SMP + RT_BASE
>   full migration program, nothing changes here
> 
> - for !SMP + RT_BASE
>   the migration counting is no longer required. It used to ensure that the task
>   is not migrated to another CPU and that this CPU remains online. !SMP ensures
>   that already.
>   Move it to CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG so the counting is done for debugging purpose
>   only.
> 
> - for all other cases including !RT
>   fallback to preempt_disable(). The only remaining users of migrate_disable()
>   are those which were converted from preempt_disable() and the futex
>   workaround which is already in the preempt_disable() section due to the
>   spin_lock that is held.
> 
> Cc: stable-rt@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: joe.korty@concurrent-rt.com
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> ---
> v1???v2: limit migrate_disable to RT only. Use preempt_disable() for !RT
>        if migrate_disable() is used.
> 
>  include/linux/preempt.h |    6 +++---
>  include/linux/sched.h   |    4 ++--
>  kernel/sched/core.c     |   23 +++++++++++------------
>  kernel/sched/debug.c    |    2 +-
>  4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)


Hi Sebastian,
v2 works for me.

I compiled and booted both smp+preempt+!rt and
smp+preempt+rt kernels, no splats on boot for either.

I ran the futex selftests on both kernels, both passed.

I ran a selection of posix tests from an old version of
the Linux Test Project, both kernels passed all tests.

Regards, and thanks,
Joe

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-06 19:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-04 17:35 [PATCH RT] sample fix for splat in futex_[un]lock_pi for !rt joe.korty
2018-07-05 15:50 ` [PATCH RT] sched/migrate_disable: fallback to preempt_disable() instead barrier() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-07-05 16:18   ` joe.korty
2018-07-05 16:59     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-07-06 10:58       ` [PATCH RT v2] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-07-06 19:05         ` joe.korty [this message]
2018-07-11 15:39         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-07-11 15:43           ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-05 16:23   ` [PATCH RT] " Steven Rostedt
2018-07-05 16:38     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180706190502.GA26154@zipoli.concurrent-rt.com \
    --to=joe.korty@concurrent-rt.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=julia@ni.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.