From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup/tracing: Move taking of spin lock out of trace event handlers
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 10:49:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180711174940.GH72677@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180709174854.74a30b57@gandalf.local.home>
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 05:48:54PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>
> It is unwise to take spin locks from the handlers of trace events.
> Mainly, because they can introduce lockups, because it introduces locks
> in places that are normally not tested. Worse yet, because trace events
> are tucked away in the include/trace/events/ directory, locks that are
> taken there are forgotten about.
>
> As a general rule, I tell people never to take any locks in a trace
> event handler.
>
> Several cgroup trace event handlers call cgroup_path() which eventually
> takes the kernfs_rename_lock spinlock. This injects the spinlock in the
> code without people realizing it. It also can cause issues for the
> PREEMPT_RT patch, as the spinlock becomes a mutex, and the trace event
> handlers are called with preemption disabled.
>
> By moving the calculation of the cgroup_path() out of the trace event
> handlers and into a macro (surrounded by a
> trace_cgroup_##type##_enabled()), then we could place the cgroup_path
> into a string, and pass that to the trace event. Not only does this
> remove the taking of the spinlock out of the trace event handler, but
> it also means that the cgroup_path() only needs to be called once (it
> is currently called twice, once to get the length to reserver the
> buffer for, and once again to get the path itself. Now it only needs to
> be done once.
>
> Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Applied to cgroup/for-4.19.
Thanks.
--
tejun
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-11 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-09 21:48 [PATCH] cgroup/tracing: Move taking of spin lock out of trace event handlers Steven Rostedt
2018-07-10 16:22 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-07-11 17:49 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180711174940.GH72677@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.