From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xtensa: use generic dma_noncoherent_ops Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 20:00:40 +0200 Message-ID: <20180711180040.GA4262@lst.de> References: <20180619070316.26327-1-hch@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Max Filippov Cc: Chris Zankel , iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, Christoph Hellwig , linux-xtensa-PjhNF2WwrV/0Sa2dR60CXw@public.gmane.org List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:57:30AM -0700, Max Filippov wrote: > > config XTENSA > > def_bool y > > select ARCH_NO_COHERENT_DMA_MMAP if !MMU > > + select ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FOR_CPU > > + select ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FOR_DEVICE > > This breaks alphabetical order of selects. Otherwise LGTM. > Sorry for the delay. > Acked-by: Max Filippov > > Will you submit it further or should I take it into the xtensa tree? Either way is fine with me, just let me know which way you prefer.