From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D8B18A5 for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 17:38:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz (atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz [195.113.26.193]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD8D7790 for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 17:38:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 19:38:12 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Willy Tarreau Message-ID: <20180714173812.xhfwtcijlxebmn2k@devuan> References: <20180501163818.GD1468@sasha-vm> <20180501194450.GD10479@thunk.org> <20180501200019.GA7397@sasha-vm> <20180501205448.GE10479@thunk.org> <20180501220228.GD7397@sasha-vm> <20180502043017.GA11938@1wt.eu> <20180502194139.GA18390@sasha-vm> <20180502200229.GA12729@1wt.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20180502200229.GA12729@1wt.eu> Cc: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , Greg KH , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] bug-introducing patches List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi! > > The way I see it, if a commit can get one or two tested-by, it's a good > > alternative to a week in -next. >=20 > Agreed. Even their own actually. And I'm not kidding. Those who run large > amounts of tests on certain patches could really mention is in tested-by, > as opposed to the most common cases where the code was just regularly > tested. Actually, it would be cool to get "Tested: no" and "Tested: compile" tags in the commit mesages. Sometimes it is clear from the context that patch was not tested (treewide update of time to 64bit), but sometime it is not. This is especially problem for -stable, as it seems that lately patches are backported from new version without any testing. Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D76ECDFAA for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 17:38:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E52A20871 for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 17:38:40 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9E52A20871 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ucw.cz Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731066AbeGNR6U convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jul 2018 13:58:20 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:40983 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727153AbeGNR6U (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jul 2018 13:58:20 -0400 Received: by atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix, from userid 512) id 50C7D80544; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 19:38:33 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 19:38:12 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Willy Tarreau Cc: Sasha Levin , "Theodore Y. Ts'o" , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , Greg KH , "julia.lawall@lip6.fr" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: bug-introducing patches Message-ID: <20180714173812.xhfwtcijlxebmn2k@devuan> References: <20180501163818.GD1468@sasha-vm> <20180501194450.GD10479@thunk.org> <20180501200019.GA7397@sasha-vm> <20180501205448.GE10479@thunk.org> <20180501220228.GD7397@sasha-vm> <20180502043017.GA11938@1wt.eu> <20180502194139.GA18390@sasha-vm> <20180502200229.GA12729@1wt.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT In-Reply-To: <20180502200229.GA12729@1wt.eu> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > The way I see it, if a commit can get one or two tested-by, it's a good > > alternative to a week in -next. > > Agreed. Even their own actually. And I'm not kidding. Those who run large > amounts of tests on certain patches could really mention is in tested-by, > as opposed to the most common cases where the code was just regularly > tested. Actually, it would be cool to get "Tested: no" and "Tested: compile" tags in the commit mesages. Sometimes it is clear from the context that patch was not tested (treewide update of time to 64bit), but sometime it is not. This is especially problem for -stable, as it seems that lately patches are backported from new version without any testing. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html