From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Sangwon Hong <qpakzk@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf list: Document missing options
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 15:28:52 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180717182852.GB3614@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180717110738.10779-1-qpakzk@gmail.com>
Em Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 08:07:38PM +0900, Sangwon Hong escreveu:
> Add the missing options --desc and --debug on the man page.
Please describe how you tested this, i.e. what difference makes using
this option you are describing?
I figured it doesn't change anything, since it is the default, so to
test if this makes any change one needs to compare the output of:
perf list --no-desc
with the output of what you just documented, i.e.:
perf list --desc
comparing what you added with not using any option shows no difference.
Thus we need to add this "(default)" to your patch, to avoid confusion:
+-d::
+--desc::
+Print extra event descriptions. (default)
I'm doing this, please consider adding this to any further work in this
area.
- Arnaldo
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sangwon Hong <qpakzk@gmail.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/Documentation/perf-list.txt | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-list.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-list.txt
> index 14e13512c05f..1d3fb2846d2d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-list.txt
> +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-list.txt
> @@ -18,6 +18,10 @@ various perf commands with the -e option.
>
> OPTIONS
> -------
> +-d::
> +--desc::
> +Print extra event descriptions.
> +
> --no-desc::
> Don't print descriptions.
>
> @@ -25,11 +29,13 @@ Don't print descriptions.
> --long-desc::
> Print longer event descriptions.
>
> +--debug::
> +Enable debugging output.
> +
> --details::
> Print how named events are resolved internally into perf events, and also
> any extra expressions computed by perf stat.
>
> -
> [[EVENT_MODIFIERS]]
> EVENT MODIFIERS
> ---------------
> --
> 2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-17 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-17 11:07 [PATCH] perf list: Document missing options Sangwon Hong
2018-07-17 18:28 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2018-07-17 18:33 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-07-25 20:44 ` [tip:perf/core] perf list: Add missing documentation for --desc and --debug options tip-bot for Sangwon Hong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180717182852.GB3614@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=qpakzk@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.