From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:48926 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731323AbeGRRNU (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2018 13:13:20 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 18:34:35 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Kai-Heng Feng Cc: mathias.nyman@intel.com, Mathias Nyman , stable Subject: Re: [PATCH] xhci: Fix perceived dead host due to runtime suspend race with event handler Message-ID: <20180718163435.GA27761@kroah.com> References: <20180718162322.9518-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> <20180718162636.GA26902@kroah.com> <01481087-7D03-4E89-87F1-2B51BC65A12E@canonical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01481087-7D03-4E89-87F1-2B51BC65A12E@canonical.com> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 12:29:30AM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > Hi Greg, > > > On 2018Jul19, at 00:26, Greg KH wrote: > > > > Any specific reason you sent this old patch that is already in Linus's > > tree out again to everyone? > > The original patch can be cleanly cherry-picked but failed to compile > to older stable kernels due to some XHCI structure change. Ok, so what am I supposed to do with it? Please always give a hint as to why you are sending a patch below the --- line. In this case, you want it applied to some stable tree, yet you didn't say which one, right? greg k-h