diff for duplicates of <20180718225311.GD32160@localhost.localdomain> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 96dcf87..087d59b 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:39:36PM +0200, hch@lst.de wrote: -> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 09:56:50PM +0200, hch@lst.de wrote: -> > On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 05:58:08PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote: +On Wed, Jul 18, 2018@10:39:36PM +0200, hch@lst.de wrote: +> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018@09:56:50PM +0200, hch@lst.de wrote: +> > On Fri, Jul 13, 2018@05:58:08PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote: > > > Of the two you mentioned, yours is preferable IMO. While I appreciate > > > Jianchao's detailed analysis, it's hard to take a proposal seriously > > > that so colourfully calls everyone else "dangerous" while advocating diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 211f811..b4fc4e5 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -8,22 +8,14 @@ "ref\020180713235807.GA19967@localhost.localdomain\0" "ref\020180718195650.GA20336@lst.de\0" "ref\020180718203936.GA21011@lst.de\0" - "From\0Keith Busch <keith.busch@linux.intel.com>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] blk-mq: Remove generation seqeunce\0" + "From\0keith.busch@linux.intel.com (Keith Busch)\0" + "Subject\0[RFC PATCH 3/3] blk-mq: Remove generation seqeunce\0" "Date\0Wed, 18 Jul 2018 16:53:11 -0600\0" - "To\0hch@lst.de <hch@lst.de>\0" - "Cc\0Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>" - keith.busch@intel.com <keith.busch@intel.com> - linux-block@vger.kernel.org <linux-block@vger.kernel.org> - linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org> - axboe@kernel.dk <axboe@kernel.dk> - ming.lei@redhat.com <ming.lei@redhat.com> - " jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" - "On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:39:36PM +0200, hch@lst.de wrote:\n" - "> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 09:56:50PM +0200, hch@lst.de wrote:\n" - "> > On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 05:58:08PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:\n" + "On Wed, Jul 18, 2018@10:39:36PM +0200, hch@lst.de wrote:\n" + "> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018@09:56:50PM +0200, hch@lst.de wrote:\n" + "> > On Fri, Jul 13, 2018@05:58:08PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:\n" "> > > Of the two you mentioned, yours is preferable IMO. While I appreciate\n" "> > > Jianchao's detailed analysis, it's hard to take a proposal seriously\n" "> > > that so colourfully calls everyone else \"dangerous\" while advocating\n" @@ -79,4 +71,4 @@ "\n" -- -f7d69ce3f91f1c60c67db23597c79454eafc411e38f2bba80aac23bb60371f99 +ddc96d167fbbbc69bd54578752c3bdb472d98bcdc1c82ffd55780b289e1c78e7
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.