From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1fhEms-0000sT-7B for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2018 13:52:40 +0000 Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2018 14:49:58 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Richard Weinberger Cc: Theuns Verwoerd , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , LKML , David Woodhouse Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] jffs2: Provide jffs2_sync files to track gc POLL progress Message-ID: <20180722134958.GE30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20180720000431.GA30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: Al Viro List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 03:17:07PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 2:54 AM, Theuns Verwoerd > wrote: > > > > On 07/20/2018 12:04 PM, Al Viro wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 11:50:12AM +1200, Theuns Verwoerd wrote: > >> > >>> +ssize_t jffs2_sync_file_read(struct file *f, > >>> + char __user *b, size_t len, loff_t *ofs) > >>> +{ > >>> + struct jffs2_sb_info *c = file_inode(f)->i_private; > >>> + > >>> + while (c->tidemark) > >>> + schedule(); > >>> + > >>> + return 0; > >>> +} > >> Brilliant. So when that gets called with c->tidemark being true and > >> need_resched() - false, we shall... > > By my reading, schedule() will happily force a reschedule (once) when > > need_resched() is false. Every time the process is granted a time > > slice, it'll check the condition and surrender if not ready. Except that the task remains runnable (and not using its timeslice up). It won't sleep; there's nothing to drive it into TASK_NOT_RUNNING state. Try it and watch what's going on when you trigger that loop. That's really not a good way to wait for something to happen.