From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/19] Fixes for sched/numa_balancing
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 08:09:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180723150954.GI30345@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180723135700.GX2458@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> [2018-07-23 15:57:00]:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:32:41PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > Srikar Dronamraju (19):
> > sched/numa: Remove redundant field.
> > sched/numa: Evaluate move once per node
> > sched/numa: Simplify load_too_imbalanced
> > sched/numa: Set preferred_node based on best_cpu
> > sched/numa: Use task faults only if numa_group is not yet setup
> > sched/debug: Reverse the order of printing faults
> > sched/numa: Skip nodes that are at hoplimit
> > sched/numa: Remove unused task_capacity from numa_stats
> > sched/numa: Modify migrate_swap to accept additional params
> > sched/numa: Restrict migrating in parallel to the same node.
> > sched/numa: Remove numa_has_capacity
> > sched/numa: Use group_weights to identify if migration degrades locality
> > sched/numa: Move task_placement closer to numa_migrate_preferred
>
> I took the above, but left the below for next time.
>
> > sched/numa: Stop multiple tasks from moving to the cpu at the same time
This patch has go-ahead from Mel and Rik and no outstanding comments.
In my analysis, I did find a lot of cases where the same cpu ended up
being the target. + I am not sure you can apply "sched/numa: Restrict
migrating in parallel to the same node" cleanly without this patch.
So I am a bit confused. If possible, please clarify.
> > mm/migrate: Use xchg instead of spinlock
Will try with spin_trylock and get back.
> > sched/numa: Updation of scan period need not be in lock
I didnt see any comments for this apart from an ack from Rik.
+ It thought it was trivial and shouldnt have any side-effect.
> > sched/numa: Detect if node actively handling migration
> > sched/numa: Pass destination cpu as a parameter to migrate_task_rq
> > sched/numa: Reset scan rate whenever task moves across nodes
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-23 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-20 17:02 [PATCH v2 00/19] Fixes for sched/numa_balancing Srikar Dronamraju
2018-06-20 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 01/19] sched/numa: Remove redundant field Srikar Dronamraju
2018-07-25 14:23 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Srikar Dronamraju
2018-06-20 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 02/19] sched/numa: Evaluate move once per node Srikar Dronamraju
2018-06-21 9:06 ` Mel Gorman
2018-07-25 14:24 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Srikar Dronamraju
2018-06-20 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 03/19] sched/numa: Simplify load_too_imbalanced Srikar Dronamraju
2018-07-25 14:24 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/numa: Simplify load_too_imbalanced() tip-bot for Srikar Dronamraju
2018-06-20 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 04/19] sched/numa: Set preferred_node based on best_cpu Srikar Dronamraju
2018-06-21 9:17 ` Mel Gorman
2018-07-25 14:25 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Srikar Dronamraju
2018-06-20 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 05/19] sched/numa: Use task faults only if numa_group is not yet setup Srikar Dronamraju
2018-06-21 9:38 ` Mel Gorman
2018-07-25 14:25 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/numa: Use task faults only if numa_group is not yet set up tip-bot for Srikar Dronamraju
2018-06-20 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 06/19] sched/debug: Reverse the order of printing faults Srikar Dronamraju
2018-07-25 14:26 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Srikar Dronamraju
2018-06-20 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 07/19] sched/numa: Skip nodes that are at hoplimit Srikar Dronamraju
2018-07-25 14:27 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/numa: Skip nodes that are at 'hoplimit' tip-bot for Srikar Dronamraju
2018-06-20 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 08/19] sched/numa: Remove unused task_capacity from numa_stats Srikar Dronamraju
2018-07-25 14:27 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/numa: Remove unused task_capacity from 'struct numa_stats' tip-bot for Srikar Dronamraju
2018-06-20 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 09/19] sched/numa: Modify migrate_swap to accept additional params Srikar Dronamraju
2018-07-25 14:28 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/numa: Modify migrate_swap() to accept additional parameters tip-bot for Srikar Dronamraju
2018-06-20 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 10/19] sched/numa: Stop multiple tasks from moving to the cpu at the same time Srikar Dronamraju
2018-06-20 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 11/19] sched/numa: Restrict migrating in parallel to the same node Srikar Dronamraju
2018-07-23 10:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-23 11:16 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2018-06-20 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 12/19] sched/numa: Remove numa_has_capacity Srikar Dronamraju
2018-07-25 14:28 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/numa: Remove numa_has_capacity() tip-bot for Srikar Dronamraju
2018-06-20 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 13/19] mm/migrate: Use xchg instead of spinlock Srikar Dronamraju
2018-06-21 9:51 ` Mel Gorman
2018-07-23 10:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-23 11:20 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2018-07-23 14:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-20 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 14/19] sched/numa: Updation of scan period need not be in lock Srikar Dronamraju
2018-06-21 9:51 ` Mel Gorman
2018-07-25 14:29 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/numa: Update the scan period without holding the numa_group lock tip-bot for Srikar Dronamraju
2018-06-20 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 15/19] sched/numa: Use group_weights to identify if migration degrades locality Srikar Dronamraju
2018-07-25 14:29 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Srikar Dronamraju
2018-06-20 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 16/19] sched/numa: Detect if node actively handling migration Srikar Dronamraju
2018-06-20 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 17/19] sched/numa: Pass destination cpu as a parameter to migrate_task_rq Srikar Dronamraju
2018-06-20 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 18/19] sched/numa: Reset scan rate whenever task moves across nodes Srikar Dronamraju
2018-06-21 10:05 ` Mel Gorman
2018-07-04 11:19 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2018-06-20 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 19/19] sched/numa: Move task_placement closer to numa_migrate_preferred Srikar Dronamraju
2018-06-21 10:06 ` Mel Gorman
2018-07-25 14:30 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/numa: Move task_numa_placement() closer to numa_migrate_preferred() tip-bot for Srikar Dronamraju
2018-06-20 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 00/19] Fixes for sched/numa_balancing Srikar Dronamraju
2018-07-23 13:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-23 15:09 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2018-07-23 15:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-23 16:29 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2018-07-23 16:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-23 15:33 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180723150954.GI30345@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.